PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMQQ vs. EMSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FMQQ vs. EMSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) and Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FMQQ vs. EMSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FMQQ
FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF
-17.94%10.77%12.45%9.64%
EMSF
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF
10.93%19.20%-3.09%1.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMQQ achieves a -17.94% return, which is significantly lower than EMSF's 10.93% return.


FMQQ

1D
0.70%
1M
-8.52%
YTD
-17.94%
6M
-23.47%
1Y
-9.56%
3Y*
3.18%
5Y*
10Y*

EMSF

1D
1.27%
1M
-6.57%
YTD
10.93%
6M
8.16%
1Y
32.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMQQ vs. EMSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than EMSF's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FMQQ vs. EMSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMQQ
FMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

EMSF
EMSF Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EMSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMSF Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EMSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMSF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMQQ vs. EMSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) and Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMQQEMSFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.46

1.32

-1.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.54

1.80

-2.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.25

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

2.23

-2.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.85

7.48

-8.33

FMQQ vs. EMSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the EMSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMQQ and EMSF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMQQEMSFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.46

1.32

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.64

0.52

-1.15

Correlation

The correlation between FMQQ and EMSF is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FMQQ vs. EMSF - Dividend Comparison

FMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than EMSF's 1.70% yield.


Drawdowns

FMQQ vs. EMSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMQQ drawdown since its inception was -64.51%, which is greater than EMSF's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMQQ and EMSF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FMQQEMSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.51%

-24.75%

-39.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.82%

-14.57%

-16.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.64%

-9.70%

-45.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.20%

-5.96%

-43.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.04%

4.34%

+6.70%

Volatility

FMQQ vs. EMSF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) is 8.99%, while Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) has a volatility of 11.37%. This indicates that FMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FMQQEMSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.99%

11.37%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.36%

19.44%

-5.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.00%

24.57%

-3.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.92%

21.78%

+3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.92%

21.78%

+3.14%