FMBH vs. BMA
FMBH (First Mid Bancshares, Inc.) and BMA (Banco Macro S.A.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, FMBH returned 7.91%/yr vs 7.34%/yr for BMA. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FMBH vs. BMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMBH achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly higher than BMA's -1.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FMBH has outperformed BMA with an annualized return of 7.91%, while BMA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.34% annualized return.
FMBH
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 6M
- 8.15%
- 1Y
- 22.86%
- 3Y*
- 23.45%
- 5Y*
- 2.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
BMA
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- 25.91%
- YTD
- -1.28%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 12.41%
- 3Y*
- 83.19%
- 5Y*
- 47.44%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
FMBH vs. BMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMBH First Mid Bancshares, Inc. | 11.89% | 8.71% | 9.10% | 11.60% | -23.21% | 29.81% | -1.79% | 12.89% | -15.58% | 15.38% |
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | -1.28% | -3.55% | 277.79% | 91.62% | 27.04% | -9.96% | -57.05% | -14.00% | -60.72% | 81.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMBH and BMA is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2006 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
FMBH:
$1.07B
BMA:
$5.51B
FMBH:
$3.96
BMA:
$5.81K
FMBH:
10.89
BMA:
0.01
FMBH:
1.29
BMA:
0.00
FMBH:
2.29
BMA:
0.00
FMBH:
1.00
BMA:
0.00
FMBH:
$456.37M
BMA:
$4.76T
FMBH:
$230.02M
BMA:
$2.84T
FMBH:
$98.76M
BMA:
$751.84B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMBH vs. BMA — Risk / Return Rank
FMBH
BMA
FMBH vs. BMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Mid Bancshares, Inc. (FMBH) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMBH | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 0.17 | +0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 0.89 | +0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.11 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 0.25 | +1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | 0.56 | +3.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMBH | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 0.17 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.80 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.12 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.19 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
FMBH vs. BMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMBH drawdown since its inception was -73.14%, smaller than the maximum BMA drawdown of -91.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMBH and BMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMBH | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.14% | -91.66% | +18.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.93% | -48.89% | +34.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.46% | -65.40% | +37.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.94% | -65.40% | +16.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.27% | -91.66% | +40.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | -20.47% | +17.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.03% | -44.86% | +15.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.65% | 23.24% | -17.59% |
Volatility
FMBH vs. BMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Mid Bancshares, Inc. (FMBH) is 6.19%, while Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) has a volatility of 18.86%. This indicates that FMBH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMBH | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 18.86% | -12.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.99% | 38.51% | -21.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.99% | 73.94% | -48.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.14% | 59.43% | -32.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.03% | 62.25% | -31.22% |
Dividends
FMBH vs. BMA - Dividend Comparison
FMBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than BMA's 5.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 5.56% | 2.38% | 6.10% | 7.75% | 7.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.20% | 5.05% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 0.00% |
FMBH First Mid Bancshares, Inc. | 2.32% | 2.51% | 2.55% | 2.65% | 2.81% | 1.99% | 2.41% | 2.16% | 2.19% | 1.71% | 1.82% | 2.27% |
Financials
FMBH vs. BMA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Mid Bancshares, Inc. and Banco Macro S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FMBH vs. BMA - Profitability Comparison
FMBH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Mid Bancshares, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 100.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.17T and revenue of 1.91T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.
FMBH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Mid Bancshares, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 100.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
BMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported an operating income of 212.69B and revenue of 1.91T, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
FMBH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Mid Bancshares, Inc. reported a net income of 26.33M and revenue of 100.62M, resulting in a net margin of 26.2%.
BMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported a net income of 140.24B and revenue of 1.91T, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FMBH and BMA have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMA has higher volatility (18.86%) compared to FMBH (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMBH dropped -73.14% vs BMA's -91.66%.
FMBH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMBH and BMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer