BMA vs. CRESY
Compare and contrast key facts about Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) and Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BMA or CRESY.
Correlation
The correlation between BMA and CRESY is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BMA vs. CRESY - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BMA:
5.49
CRESY:
1.21
BMA:
4.61
CRESY:
1.84
BMA:
1.57
CRESY:
1.21
BMA:
4.34
CRESY:
0.80
BMA:
36.72
CRESY:
3.94
BMA:
8.64%
CRESY:
12.63%
BMA:
57.82%
CRESY:
41.24%
BMA:
-91.66%
CRESY:
-89.41%
BMA:
-9.84%
CRESY:
-32.31%
Fundamentals
BMA:
$8.26B
CRESY:
$836.12M
BMA:
$6.62
CRESY:
-$1.56
BMA:
0.90
CRESY:
0.00
BMA:
$2.96T
CRESY:
$627.44B
BMA:
$2.96T
CRESY:
$213.37B
BMA:
$52.62B
CRESY:
-$276.43B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMA achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly higher than CRESY's -4.28% return. Over the past 10 years, BMA has outperformed CRESY with an annualized return of 14.34%, while CRESY has yielded a comparatively lower 3.49% annualized return.
BMA
7.95%
8.01%
102.82%
299.99%
33.33%
14.34%
CRESY
-4.28%
-1.14%
60.41%
48.23%
20.16%
3.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BMA vs. CRESY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BMA
CRESY
BMA vs. CRESY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) and Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BMA vs. CRESY - Dividend Comparison
BMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, less than CRESY's 8.21% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 5.08% | 6.10% | 7.75% | 6.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.20% | 5.05% | 0.65% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 2.87% |
CRESY Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria | 8.21% | 7.86% | 7.34% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BMA vs. CRESY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMA drawdown since its inception was -91.66%, roughly equal to the maximum CRESY drawdown of -89.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMA and CRESY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BMA vs. CRESY - Volatility Comparison
Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) has a higher volatility of 20.63% compared to Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) at 13.29%. This indicates that BMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRESY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BMA vs. CRESY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco Macro S.A. and Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities