BMA vs. CRESY
BMA (Banco Macro S.A.) and CRESY (Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria) are both stocks. BMA operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while CRESY operates in Conglomerates (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, BMA returned 7.89%/yr vs 4.41%/yr for CRESY. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BMA vs. CRESY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMA achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly higher than CRESY's -9.34% return. Over the past 10 years, BMA has outperformed CRESY with an annualized return of 7.89%, while CRESY has yielded a comparatively lower 4.41% annualized return.
BMA
- 1D
- -3.36%
- 1M
- 24.52%
- YTD
- 7.73%
- 6M
- 7.60%
- 1Y
- 45.58%
- 3Y*
- 69.62%
- 5Y*
- 52.24%
- 10Y*
- 7.89%
CRESY
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- -9.34%
- 6M
- -1.97%
- 1Y
- 16.59%
- 3Y*
- 23.06%
- 5Y*
- 22.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.41%
BMA vs. CRESY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 7.73% | -3.55% | 277.79% | 91.62% | 27.04% | -9.96% | -57.05% | -14.00% | -60.72% | 81.54% |
CRESY Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria | -9.34% | 8.03% | 46.53% | 73.99% | 45.48% | -1.46% | -31.96% | -40.52% | -42.64% | 42.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMA and CRESY is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2006 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, BMA and CRESY have become more correlated (0.68) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
BMA:
$6.01B
CRESY:
$733.19M
BMA:
ARS 5.81K
CRESY:
ARS 2.87K
BMA:
23.64
CRESY:
5.82
BMA:
0.04
CRESY:
0.00
BMA:
1.84
CRESY:
0.98
BMA:
1.50
CRESY:
0.82
BMA:
ARS 4.76T
CRESY:
ARS 1.11T
BMA:
ARS 2.84T
CRESY:
ARS 467.81B
BMA:
ARS 751.84B
CRESY:
ARS 303.50B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMA vs. CRESY — Risk / Return Rank
BMA
CRESY
BMA vs. CRESY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) and Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMA | CRESY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.11 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 0.58 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | 1.14 | +1.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMA vs. CRESY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMA drawdown since its inception was -91.66%, roughly equal to the maximum CRESY drawdown of -88.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMA and CRESY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMA | CRESY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.66% | -88.67% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.38% | -28.70% | -18.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.40% | -39.92% | -25.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.40% | -55.88% | -9.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.66% | -88.67% | -2.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.22% | -18.85% | +5.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.77% | -45.80% | +1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.25% | 14.58% | +6.67% |
Volatility
BMA vs. CRESY - Volatility Comparison
Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) has a higher volatility of 17.97% compared to Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) at 15.30%. This indicates that BMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRESY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMA | CRESY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.97% | 15.30% | +2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.49% | 28.80% | +10.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.66% | 49.60% | +25.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.68% | 50.45% | +9.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.38% | 53.23% | +9.15% |
Dividends
BMA vs. CRESY - Dividend Comparison
BMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, less than CRESY's 5.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 5.09% | 2.38% | 6.10% | 7.75% | 7.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.20% | 5.05% | 0.65% | 1.53% |
CRESY Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria | 5.50% | 4.98% | 7.86% | 7.32% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.95% | 6.39% |
Financials
BMA vs. CRESY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco Macro S.A. and Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BMA vs. CRESY - Profitability Comparison
BMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.17T and revenue of 1.91T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.
CRESY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria reported a gross profit of 117.98B and revenue of 252.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.7%.
BMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported an operating income of 212.69B and revenue of 1.91T, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
CRESY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria reported an operating income of 45.85B and revenue of 252.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
BMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported a net income of 140.24B and revenue of 1.91T, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
CRESY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria reported a net income of 40.19B and revenue of 252.69B, resulting in a net margin of 15.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BMA and CRESY have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMA has higher volatility (17.97%) compared to CRESY (15.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMA dropped -91.66% vs CRESY's -88.67%.
BMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMA and CRESY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer