FMBH vs. RGA
FMBH (First Mid Bancshares, Inc.) and RGA (Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — FMBH in Banks - Regional, RGA in Insurance - Reinsurance. Over the past 10 years, FMBH returned 11.11%/yr vs 11.32%/yr for RGA. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FMBH vs. RGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMBH achieves a 35.14% return, which is significantly higher than RGA's 17.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FMBH having a 11.11% annualized return and RGA not far ahead at 11.32%.
FMBH
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 25.19%
- YTD
- 35.14%
- 1Y
- 42.56%
- 3Y*
- 22.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.46%
RGA
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 17.66%
- 1Y
- 36.34%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 19.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.51M | $7.31M | $6.77M | |
| $80.43M | $84.29M | $82.13M |
FMBH vs. RGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMBH First Mid Bancshares, Inc. | 35.14% | 8.71% | 9.10% | 11.60% | -23.21% | 29.81% | -1.79% | 12.89% | -15.58% | 15.38% |
RGA Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 17.66% | -2.97% | 34.38% | 16.39% | 33.04% | -3.21% | -27.02% | 18.29% | -8.71% | 25.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMBH and RGA is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2008 | 0.30 |
The correlation between FMBH and RGA shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FMBH:
$1.39B
RGA:
$15.52B
FMBH:
$4.03
RGA:
$20.15
FMBH:
12.92
RGA:
11.76
FMBH:
1.53
RGA:
0.45
FMBH:
2.84
RGA:
0.58
FMBH:
$455.40M
RGA:
$18.13B
FMBH:
$296.72M
RGA:
$3.15B
FMBH:
$90.81M
RGA:
$1.46B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMBH vs. RGA — Risk / Return Rank
FMBH
RGA
FMBH vs. RGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Mid Bancshares, Inc. (FMBH) and Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMBH | RGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.21 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.03 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.42 | 5.07 | +2.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMBH vs. RGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMBH drawdown since its inception was -73.14%, which is greater than RGA's maximum drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMBH and RGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMBH | RGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.14% | -65.75% | -7.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.93% | -12.68% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.46% | -27.11% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.94% | -27.11% | -21.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.27% | -65.75% | +14.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -2.39% | +1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.87% | -11.61% | -17.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.49% | 5.16% | +0.33% |
Volatility
FMBH vs. RGA - Volatility Comparison
First Mid Bancshares, Inc. (FMBH) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) at 7.02%. This indicates that FMBH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMBH | RGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.54% | 7.02% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.07% | 17.74% | -1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.73% | 23.88% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.01% | 27.55% | -0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.09% | 32.92% | -1.83% |
Dividends
FMBH vs. RGA - Dividend Comparison
FMBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than RGA's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMBH First Mid Bancshares, Inc. | 1.92% | 2.51% | 2.55% | 2.65% | 2.81% | 1.99% | 2.41% | 2.16% | 2.19% | 1.71% | 1.82% | 2.27% |
RGA Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 1.76% | 1.79% | 1.63% | 2.04% | 2.15% | 2.61% | 2.42% | 1.59% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.24% | 1.64% |
Financials
FMBH vs. RGA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Mid Bancshares, Inc. and Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FMBH vs. RGA - Profitability Comparison
FMBH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Mid Bancshares, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.66M and revenue of 114.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.3%.
RGA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FMBH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Mid Bancshares, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.49M and revenue of 114.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.5%.
RGA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported an operating income of 441.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.
FMBH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Mid Bancshares, Inc. reported a net income of 27.79M and revenue of 114.88M, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.
RGA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a net income of 331.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FMBH and RGA have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMBH has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to RGA (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMBH dropped -73.14% vs RGA's -65.75%.
FMBH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMBH and RGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer