BMA vs. GGAL
Compare and contrast key facts about Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) and Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BMA or GGAL.
Key characteristics
| BMA | GGAL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 93.01% | 87.84% |
| 1Y Return | 246.37% | 212.04% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 68.92% | 71.06% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.04% | 10.61% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.91% | 10.91% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 4.08 | 3.55 |
| Daily Std Dev | 58.14% | 57.24% |
| Max Drawdown | -91.66% | -98.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -48.84% | -47.21% |
Fundamentals
| BMA | GGAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.82B | $5.39B |
| EPS | $0.54 | $2.61 |
| PE Ratio | 95.15 | 11.76 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.90 | 0.75 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.84T | $3.28T |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $491.99B | $685.85B |
Correlation
The correlation between BMA and GGAL is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BMA vs. GGAL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BMA achieves a 93.01% return, which is significantly higher than GGAL's 87.84% return. Over the past 10 years, BMA has underperformed GGAL with an annualized return of 8.91%, while GGAL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BMA vs. GGAL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) and Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BMA vs. GGAL - Dividend Comparison
BMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than GGAL's 3.22% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 4.38% | 6.20% | 6.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.20% | 5.05% | 0.65% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 2.87% | 0.00% |
GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 3.22% | 6.49% | 4.62% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.89% | 1.31% | 0.18% | 0.30% | 0.32% | 0.23% | 0.35% |
Drawdowns
BMA vs. GGAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMA drawdown since its inception was -91.66%, smaller than the maximum GGAL drawdown of -98.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMA and GGAL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BMA vs. GGAL - Volatility Comparison
Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) and Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) have volatilities of 17.24% and 16.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BMA vs. GGAL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco Macro S.A. and Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities