BMA vs. GGAL
Compare and contrast key facts about Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) and Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BMA or GGAL.
Correlation
The correlation between BMA and GGAL is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BMA vs. GGAL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BMA:
4.84
GGAL:
5.44
BMA:
4.32
GGAL:
4.69
BMA:
1.53
GGAL:
1.60
BMA:
3.54
GGAL:
3.90
BMA:
30.79
GGAL:
32.47
BMA:
8.81%
GGAL:
8.97%
BMA:
56.01%
GGAL:
53.57%
BMA:
-91.66%
GGAL:
-98.98%
BMA:
-9.48%
GGAL:
-7.47%
Fundamentals
BMA:
$6.71B
GGAL:
$11.01B
BMA:
$7.25
GGAL:
$5.27
BMA:
14.74
GGAL:
13.04
BMA:
0.90
GGAL:
0.75
BMA:
$4.80T
GGAL:
$7.18T
BMA:
$4.80T
GGAL:
$7.18T
BMA:
$669.76B
GGAL:
$686.59B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMA achieves a 277.55% return, which is significantly lower than GGAL's 296.97% return. Over the past 10 years, BMA has underperformed GGAL with an annualized return of 12.18%, while GGAL has yielded a comparatively higher 17.66% annualized return.
BMA
277.55%
18.22%
79.10%
269.44%
30.12%
12.18%
GGAL
296.97%
10.28%
107.33%
285.69%
39.75%
17.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BMA vs. GGAL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) and Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BMA vs. GGAL - Dividend Comparison
BMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than GGAL's 3.73% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 6.10% | 6.20% | 6.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.20% | 5.05% | 0.65% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 2.87% | 0.00% |
GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 3.73% | 6.49% | 4.62% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 1.93% | 1.31% | 0.18% | 0.30% | 0.32% | 0.23% | 0.35% |
Drawdowns
BMA vs. GGAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMA drawdown since its inception was -91.66%, smaller than the maximum GGAL drawdown of -98.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMA and GGAL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BMA vs. GGAL - Volatility Comparison
Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) has a higher volatility of 20.86% compared to Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) at 16.92%. This indicates that BMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BMA vs. GGAL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco Macro S.A. and Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities