BMA vs. JXN
Compare and contrast key facts about Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) and Jackson Financial Inc. (JXN).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BMA or JXN.
Performance
BMA vs. JXN - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMA achieves a 212.39% return, which is significantly higher than JXN's 98.98% return.
BMA
212.39%
10.48%
53.89%
294.61%
33.05%
9.93%
JXN
98.98%
-0.03%
29.71%
123.98%
N/A
N/A
Fundamentals
| BMA | JXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.64B | $7.28B |
| EPS | $7.35 | -$11.55 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $2.59T | $2.54B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $4.31T | -$249.00M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -$1.56 | -$1.20B |
Key characteristics
| BMA | JXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 4.79 | 3.31 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.33 | 3.74 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.53 | 1.55 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.39 | 5.86 |
| Martin Ratio | 30.45 | 27.10 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.81% | 4.66% |
| Daily Std Dev | 55.95% | 38.09% |
| Max Drawdown | -91.66% | -48.34% |
| Current Drawdown | -17.20% | -13.06% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between BMA and JXN is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BMA vs. JXN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) and Jackson Financial Inc. (JXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BMA vs. JXN - Dividend Comparison
BMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, more than JXN's 2.75% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 7.38% | 6.20% | 6.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.20% | 5.05% | 0.65% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 2.87% |
JXN Jackson Financial Inc. | 2.75% | 4.84% | 6.32% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BMA vs. JXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMA drawdown since its inception was -91.66%, which is greater than JXN's maximum drawdown of -48.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMA and JXN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BMA vs. JXN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) is 15.20%, while Jackson Financial Inc. (JXN) has a volatility of 17.38%. This indicates that BMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BMA vs. JXN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco Macro S.A. and Jackson Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities