PortfoliosLab logo
BMA vs. TEO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BMA and TEO is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BMA vs. TEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) and Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BMA:

0.85

TEO:

0.25

Sortino Ratio

BMA:

1.58

TEO:

0.82

Omega Ratio

BMA:

1.18

TEO:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

BMA:

0.98

TEO:

0.20

Martin Ratio

BMA:

3.17

TEO:

0.74

Ulcer Index

BMA:

16.45%

TEO:

20.73%

Daily Std Dev

BMA:

61.85%

TEO:

55.47%

Max Drawdown

BMA:

-91.66%

TEO:

-98.60%

Current Drawdown

BMA:

-23.98%

TEO:

-58.50%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BMA:

$5.53B

TEO:

$3.02B

EPS

BMA:

$4.26

TEO:

$1.97

PE Ratio

BMA:

20.67

TEO:

5.32

PEG Ratio

BMA:

0.90

TEO:

1.15

PS Ratio

BMA:

0.00

TEO:

0.00

PB Ratio

BMA:

1.56

TEO:

0.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

BMA:

$3.49T

TEO:

$3.12T

Gross Profit (TTM)

BMA:

$2.40T

TEO:

$2.30T

EBITDA (TTM)

BMA:

-$336.62B

TEO:

$1.42T

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMA achieves a -8.98% return, which is significantly higher than TEO's -16.68% return. Over the past 10 years, BMA has outperformed TEO with an annualized return of 8.77%, while TEO has yielded a comparatively lower -1.59% annualized return.


BMA

YTD

-8.98%

1M

23.17%

6M

11.16%

1Y

54.63%

5Y*

42.54%

10Y*

8.77%

TEO

YTD

-16.68%

1M

3.15%

6M

-7.44%

1Y

12.50%

5Y*

12.36%

10Y*

-1.59%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BMA vs. TEO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BMA is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BMA is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BMA is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BMA is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BMA is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BMA is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

TEO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TEO is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TEO is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TEO is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TEO is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TEO is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TEO is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BMA vs. TEO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) and Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BMA Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the TEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMA and TEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BMA vs. TEO - Dividend Comparison

BMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than TEO's 1.94% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BMA
Banco Macro S.A.
6.02%6.10%6.20%6.79%0.00%0.00%6.20%5.05%0.65%1.56%0.00%2.87%
TEO
Telecom Argentina S.A.
1.94%1.62%3.43%5.76%7.89%5.66%11.72%15.08%3.33%3.88%2.89%5.87%

Drawdowns

BMA vs. TEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMA drawdown since its inception was -91.66%, smaller than the maximum TEO drawdown of -98.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMA and TEO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BMA vs. TEO - Volatility Comparison

Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) has a higher volatility of 20.52% compared to Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO) at 15.37%. This indicates that BMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BMA vs. TEO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco Macro S.A. and Telecom Argentina S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00B1.00T1.50T2.00T20212022202320242025
1.09T
1.29T
(BMA) Total Revenue
(TEO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items