FM.TO vs. WPM
FM.TO (First Quantum Minerals Ltd.) and WPM (Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — FM.TO in Copper, WPM in Gold. Over the past 10 years, FM.TO returned 18.37%/yr vs 21.64%/yr for WPM. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FM.TO vs. WPM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FM.TO is traded in CAD, while WPM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WPM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FM.TO achieves a 17.91% return, which is significantly higher than WPM's 1.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FM.TO has underperformed WPM with an annualized return of 18.37%, while WPM has yielded a comparatively higher 21.64% annualized return.
FM.TO
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- 16.58%
- YTD
- 17.91%
- 6M
- 30.46%
- 1Y
- 107.01%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- 18.37%
WPM
- 1D
- 3.35%
- 1M
- -16.51%
- YTD
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- 40.65%
- 5Y*
- 24.27%
- 10Y*
- 21.64%
FM.TO vs. WPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FM.TO First Quantum Minerals Ltd. | 17.91% | 98.60% | 70.78% | -61.41% | -5.96% | 32.52% | 73.68% | 19.40% | -37.27% | 32.00% |
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 1.21% | 100.91% | 25.00% | 24.86% | -1.67% | 4.17% | 38.45% | 48.25% | -2.47% | 8.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between FM.TO and WPM is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.30 |
The correlation between FM.TO and WPM shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (10 years) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FM.TO:
CA$36.11B
WPM:
$52.82B
FM.TO:
-$0.24
WPM:
$3.96
FM.TO:
4.76
WPM:
19.23
FM.TO:
2.33
WPM:
5.70
FM.TO:
$5.43B
WPM:
$2.75B
FM.TO:
$1.39B
WPM:
$2.12B
FM.TO:
$1.71B
WPM:
$2.38B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FM.TO vs. WPM — Risk / Return Rank
FM.TO
WPM
FM.TO vs. WPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FM.TO | WPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.15 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 0.97 | +2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.27 | 2.71 | +7.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FM.TO vs. WPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FM.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.98%, which is greater than WPM's maximum drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FM.TO and WPM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FM.TO | WPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.98% | -47.50% | -43.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.35% | -33.56% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.27% | -33.56% | -41.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.27% | -39.49% | -38.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.27% | -47.50% | -30.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.94% | -28.09% | +22.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.62% | -19.28% | -19.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.46% | 11.95% | -1.49% |
Volatility
FM.TO vs. WPM - Volatility Comparison
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) has a higher volatility of 21.17% compared to Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) at 16.90%. This indicates that FM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FM.TO | WPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.17% | 16.90% | +4.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.43% | 39.12% | +1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.81% | 45.82% | +1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.78% | 35.85% | +21.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.30% | 37.34% | +22.96% |
Dividends
FM.TO vs. WPM - Dividend Comparison
FM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FM.TO First Quantum Minerals Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.94% | 0.58% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 1.58% |
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 0.62% | 0.56% | 1.10% | 1.22% | 1.54% | 1.33% | 1.01% | 1.21% | 1.84% | 1.49% | 1.09% | 0.00% |
Financials
FM.TO vs. WPM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Quantum Minerals Ltd. and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FM.TO vs. WPM - Profitability Comparison
FM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Quantum Minerals Ltd. reported a gross profit of 278.00M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.
WPM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a gross profit of 689.26M and revenue of 888.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.
FM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Quantum Minerals Ltd. reported an operating income of 190.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.5%.
WPM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported an operating income of 666.92M and revenue of 888.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.0%.
FM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Quantum Minerals Ltd. reported a net income of -196.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of -14.0%.
WPM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a net income of 573.98M and revenue of 888.98M, resulting in a net margin of 64.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FM.TO and WPM have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FM.TO and WPM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer