PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WPM vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WPM vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPM achieves a 7.42% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -1.95% return. Over the past 10 years, WPM has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 21.21%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.11% annualized return.


WPM

1D
-1.86%
1M
-2.67%
YTD
7.42%
6M
9.70%
1Y
38.81%
3Y*
42.35%
5Y*
25.00%
10Y*
21.21%

GLD

1D
-2.27%
1M
-7.13%
YTD
-1.95%
6M
-2.68%
1Y
24.58%
3Y*
28.86%
5Y*
18.70%
10Y*
12.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPM vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
7.42%110.52%15.24%27.91%-7.53%4.22%41.82%54.62%-10.04%16.41%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-1.95%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between WPM and GLD is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.69

The correlation between WPM and GLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WPM vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPM
WPM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
WPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
WPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPM vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WPMGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.19

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

1.01

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.12

2.82

+0.30

WPM vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPM Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPM and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WPM vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPM drawdown since its inception was -48.64%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPM and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WPMGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.64%

-45.56%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.92%

-24.46%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.92%

-24.46%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.29%

-24.46%

-18.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.64%

-24.46%

-24.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.82%

-21.64%

-2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.87%

-16.16%

-2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.49%

8.75%

+3.74%

Volatility

WPM vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) has a higher volatility of 17.64% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 8.35%. This indicates that WPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WPMGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.64%

8.35%

+9.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.70%

24.31%

+15.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.56%

27.49%

+19.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.55%

18.22%

+17.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.83%

16.11%

+20.72%

Dividends

WPM vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

WPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
0.57%0.56%1.10%1.22%1.54%1.33%1.01%1.21%1.84%1.49%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


WPM and GLD have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WPM has higher volatility (17.64%) compared to GLD (8.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WPM dropped -48.64% vs GLD's -45.56%.

GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WPM and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer