PortfoliosLab logo
WPM vs. AEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WPM and AEM is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

WPM vs. AEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WPM:

1.29

AEM:

1.70

Sortino Ratio

WPM:

1.79

AEM:

2.16

Omega Ratio

WPM:

1.24

AEM:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

WPM:

2.34

AEM:

3.28

Martin Ratio

WPM:

5.81

AEM:

10.88

Ulcer Index

WPM:

7.44%

AEM:

5.35%

Daily Std Dev

WPM:

32.86%

AEM:

34.24%

Max Drawdown

WPM:

-86.74%

AEM:

-90.33%

Current Drawdown

WPM:

-8.48%

AEM:

-13.78%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WPM:

$35.75B

AEM:

$53.63B

EPS

WPM:

$1.36

AEM:

$4.78

PE Ratio

WPM:

57.92

AEM:

22.28

PEG Ratio

WPM:

2.40

AEM:

28.15

PS Ratio

WPM:

24.51

AEM:

6.01

PB Ratio

WPM:

4.79

AEM:

2.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

WPM:

$1.46B

AEM:

$8.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WPM:

$1.02B

AEM:

$4.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

WPM:

$806.57M

AEM:

$5.17B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPM achieves a 39.88% return, which is significantly higher than AEM's 36.68% return. Over the past 10 years, WPM has outperformed AEM with an annualized return of 16.45%, while AEM has yielded a comparatively lower 14.72% annualized return.


WPM

YTD

39.88%

1M

-7.39%

6M

34.42%

1Y

41.99%

5Y*

12.89%

10Y*

16.45%

AEM

YTD

36.68%

1M

-13.13%

6M

39.93%

1Y

57.79%

5Y*

11.96%

10Y*

14.72%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WPM vs. AEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WPM is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WPM is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WPM is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WPM is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WPM is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WPM is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

AEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AEM is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AEM is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AEM is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AEM is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AEM is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AEM is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WPM vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current WPM Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the AEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPM and AEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

WPM vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison

WPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than AEM's 1.50% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
0.80%1.10%1.22%1.54%1.33%1.01%1.21%1.84%1.49%1.09%1.61%1.28%
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.50%2.05%2.92%3.08%2.63%1.35%1.10%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%1.29%

Drawdowns

WPM vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPM drawdown since its inception was -86.74%, roughly equal to the maximum AEM drawdown of -90.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPM and AEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

WPM vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) is 12.55%, while Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that WPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

WPM vs. AEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
470.41M
2.47B
(WPM) Total Revenue
(AEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WPM vs. AEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
67.8%
52.0%
(WPM) Gross Margin
(AEM) Gross Margin
WPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a gross profit of 319.08M and revenue of 470.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.8%.

AEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 1.28B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.

WPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported an operating income of 290.68M and revenue of 470.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.8%.

AEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.0%.

WPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a net income of 253.98M and revenue of 470.41M, resulting in a net margin of 54.0%.

AEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 814.73M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 33.0%.