FLUT vs. ASML
FLUT (Flutter Entertainment PLC) and ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) are both stocks. FLUT operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical), while ASML operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 5 years, FLUT returned -11.75%/yr vs 21.59%/yr for ASML. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLUT vs. ASML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLUT achieves a -53.17% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 61.93% return.
FLUT
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -3.59%
- YTD
- -53.17%
- 6M
- -52.45%
- 1Y
- -59.16%
- 3Y*
- -20.40%
- 5Y*
- -11.75%
- 10Y*
- —
ASML
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 24.54%
- YTD
- 61.93%
- 6M
- 51.85%
- 1Y
- 132.84%
- 3Y*
- 34.91%
- 5Y*
- 21.59%
- 10Y*
- 34.11%
FLUT vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLUT Flutter Entertainment PLC | -53.17% | -16.80% | 44.39% | 32.84% | -14.44% | -23.51% | 79.04% | 51.44% | -32.00% | 23.91% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 61.93% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -30.49% | 64.13% | 66.06% | 93.56% | -9.80% | 3.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLUT and ASML is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2017 | 0.22 |
The correlation between FLUT and ASML shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FLUT:
-$3.39
ASML:
$25.86
FLUT:
0.79
ASML:
19.84
FLUT:
$17.02B
ASML:
$33.69B
FLUT:
$7.53B
ASML:
$17.72B
FLUT:
$1.32B
ASML:
$12.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLUT vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank
FLUT
ASML
FLUT vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flutter Entertainment PLC (FLUT) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLUT | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.71 | 1.45 | -0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 7.48 | -8.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 20.18 | -21.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLUT | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.38 | 3.29 | -4.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | 0.52 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.56 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
FLUT vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLUT drawdown since its inception was -70.06%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUT and ASML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLUT | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.06% | -90.00% | +19.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.06% | -17.85% | -52.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.06% | -45.38% | -24.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.06% | -56.84% | -13.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.37% | 0.00% | -67.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.62% | -28.15% | +4.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.33% | 6.61% | +34.72% |
Volatility
FLUT vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison
Flutter Entertainment PLC (FLUT) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) have volatilities of 14.29% and 14.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLUT | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.29% | 14.67% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.53% | 32.21% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.89% | 40.58% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.23% | 42.03% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.81% | 38.50% | +8.31% |
Dividends
FLUT vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison
FLUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.51% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.86% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 1.40% | 0.94% | 0.64% | 0.92% | 0.73% |
FLUT Flutter Entertainment PLC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FLUT vs. ASML - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flutter Entertainment PLC and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FLUT vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison
FLUT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flutter Entertainment PLC reported a gross profit of 1.84B and revenue of 4.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.7%.
ASML - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.65B and revenue of 8.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.
FLUT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flutter Entertainment PLC reported an operating income of 79.00M and revenue of 4.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.8%.
ASML - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.16B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.
FLUT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flutter Entertainment PLC reported a net income of 218.00M and revenue of 4.30B, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.
ASML - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.76B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in a net margin of 31.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLUT and ASML have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASML has higher volatility (14.67%) compared to FLUT (14.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLUT dropped -70.06% vs ASML's -90.00%.
ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLUT and ASML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer