FLUT vs. MSGS
FLUT (Flutter Entertainment PLC) and MSGS (Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.) are both stocks. FLUT operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical), while MSGS operates in Entertainment (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, FLUT returned -9.60%/yr vs 20.42%/yr for MSGS. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FLUT vs. MSGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLUT achieves a -51.42% return, which is significantly lower than MSGS's 52.21% return.
FLUT
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- 6M
- -36.74%
- YTD
- -51.42%
- 1Y
- -65.13%
- 3Y*
- -18.78%
- 5Y*
- -9.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.69%
MSGS
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 38.84%
- YTD
- 52.21%
- 1Y
- 97.28%
- 3Y*
- 23.51%
- 5Y*
- 20.42%
- 10Y*
- 16.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $224.20M | $222.64M | $284.43M | |
| $58.43M | $66.06M | $92.90M |
FLUT vs. MSGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLUT Flutter Entertainment PLC | -51.42% | -16.80% | 44.39% | 32.84% | -14.44% | -23.51% | 79.04% | 51.44% | -32.00% | 23.91% |
MSGS Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. | 52.21% | 14.61% | 24.12% | -0.82% | 10.47% | -5.63% | 23.03% | 9.90% | 26.96% | -1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLUT and MSGS is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2017 | 0.15 |
The correlation between FLUT and MSGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FLUT:
$18.12B
MSGS:
$9.48B
FLUT:
-$3.81
MSGS:
-$0.07
FLUT:
0.73
MSGS:
8.82
FLUT:
$17.02B
MSGS:
$1.08B
FLUT:
$7.53B
MSGS:
$48.32M
FLUT:
$1.32B
MSGS:
-$41.02M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLUT vs. MSGS — Risk / Return Rank
FLUT
MSGS
FLUT vs. MSGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flutter Entertainment PLC (FLUT) and Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLUT | MSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.68 | 1.59 | -0.92 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 9.46 | -10.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 23.79 | -25.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLUT vs. MSGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLUT drawdown since its inception was -70.06%, which is greater than MSGS's maximum drawdown of -41.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUT and MSGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLUT | MSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.06% | -41.57% | -28.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.06% | -10.08% | -59.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.06% | -25.54% | -44.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.06% | -31.96% | -38.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.15% | -2.81% | -63.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.51% | -10.46% | -14.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.95% | 4.00% | +44.95% |
Volatility
FLUT vs. MSGS - Volatility Comparison
Flutter Entertainment PLC (FLUT) has a higher volatility of 11.60% compared to Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) at 5.94%. This indicates that FLUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLUT | MSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.60% | 5.94% | +5.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.35% | 23.75% | +12.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.23% | 29.76% | +15.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.50% | 25.55% | +18.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.79% | 31.52% | +15.27% |
Dividends
FLUT vs. MSGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLUT nor MSGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLUT Flutter Entertainment PLC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.75% |
MSGS Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.82% | 0.00% | 36.97% | 0.00% |
Financials
FLUT vs. MSGS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flutter Entertainment PLC and Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FLUT vs. MSGS - Profitability Comparison
FLUT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flutter Entertainment PLC reported a gross profit of 1.84B and revenue of 4.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.7%.
MSGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. reported a gross profit of -121.61M and revenue of 432.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -28.1%.
FLUT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flutter Entertainment PLC reported an operating income of 79.00M and revenue of 4.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.8%.
MSGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. reported an operating income of 1.96M and revenue of 432.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.
FLUT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flutter Entertainment PLC reported a net income of 218.00M and revenue of 4.30B, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.
MSGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. reported a net income of 555.00K and revenue of 432.20M, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLUT and MSGS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLUT has higher volatility (11.60%) compared to MSGS (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLUT dropped -70.06% vs MSGS's -41.57%.
MSGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs -1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLUT and MSGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer