FLUT vs. SNOW
FLUT (Flutter Entertainment PLC) and SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) are both stocks. FLUT operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical), while SNOW operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, FLUT returned -9.60%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for SNOW. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FLUT vs. SNOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLUT achieves a -51.42% return, which is significantly lower than SNOW's 33.70% return.
FLUT
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- 6M
- -36.74%
- YTD
- -51.42%
- 1Y
- -65.13%
- 3Y*
- -18.78%
- 5Y*
- -9.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.69%
SNOW
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 52.20%
- YTD
- 33.70%
- 1Y
- 43.05%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 1.99%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $224.20M | $222.64M | $284.43M | |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | $1.36B | $1.31B | $1.77B |
FLUT vs. SNOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLUT Flutter Entertainment PLC | -51.42% | -16.80% | 44.39% | 32.84% | -14.44% | -23.51% | 27.71% |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 33.70% | 42.06% | -22.41% | 38.64% | -57.63% | 20.38% | 14.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLUT and SNOW is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
FLUT:
$18.12B
SNOW:
$101.65B
FLUT:
-$3.81
SNOW:
-$3.51
FLUT:
0.73
SNOW:
19.88
FLUT:
$17.02B
SNOW:
$5.03B
FLUT:
$7.53B
SNOW:
$3.38B
FLUT:
$1.32B
SNOW:
-$1.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLUT vs. SNOW — Risk / Return Rank
FLUT
SNOW
FLUT vs. SNOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flutter Entertainment PLC (FLUT) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLUT | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.68 | 1.16 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 0.56 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 1.21 | -2.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLUT vs. SNOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLUT drawdown since its inception was -70.06%, roughly equal to the maximum SNOW drawdown of -72.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUT and SNOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLUT | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.06% | -72.99% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.06% | -56.30% | -13.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.06% | -56.30% | -13.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.06% | -72.99% | +2.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.15% | -27.02% | -39.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.51% | -48.72% | +24.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.95% | 26.11% | +22.84% |
Volatility
FLUT vs. SNOW - Volatility Comparison
Flutter Entertainment PLC (FLUT) has a higher volatility of 11.60% compared to Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) at 9.54%. This indicates that FLUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLUT | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.60% | 9.54% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.35% | 52.74% | -16.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.23% | 66.43% | -21.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.50% | 62.02% | -17.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.79% | 62.28% | -15.49% |
Dividends
FLUT vs. SNOW - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLUT nor SNOW has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLUT Flutter Entertainment PLC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.75% |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FLUT vs. SNOW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flutter Entertainment PLC and Snowflake Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FLUT vs. SNOW - Profitability Comparison
FLUT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flutter Entertainment PLC reported a gross profit of 1.84B and revenue of 4.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.7%.
SNOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a gross profit of 926.45M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.
FLUT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flutter Entertainment PLC reported an operating income of 79.00M and revenue of 4.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.8%.
SNOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported an operating income of -326.15M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.5%.
FLUT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flutter Entertainment PLC reported a net income of 218.00M and revenue of 4.30B, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.
SNOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a net income of -295.57M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of -21.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLUT and SNOW have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLUT has higher volatility (11.60%) compared to SNOW (9.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLUT dropped -70.06% vs SNOW's -72.99%.
SNOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLUT and SNOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer