ASML vs. LRCX
Compare and contrast key facts about ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASML or LRCX.
Correlation
The correlation between ASML and LRCX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ASML vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ASML:
-0.08
LRCX:
-0.10
ASML:
0.20
LRCX:
0.16
ASML:
1.03
LRCX:
1.02
ASML:
-0.09
LRCX:
-0.12
ASML:
-0.17
LRCX:
-0.21
ASML:
20.55%
LRCX:
20.53%
ASML:
44.94%
LRCX:
43.32%
ASML:
-90.00%
LRCX:
-87.91%
ASML:
-34.24%
LRCX:
-34.11%
Fundamentals
ASML:
$289.08B
LRCX:
$100.12B
ASML:
$18.53
LRCX:
$3.09
ASML:
39.68
LRCX:
25.18
ASML:
1.87
LRCX:
1.50
ASML:
$26.24B
LRCX:
$15.59B
ASML:
$13.42B
LRCX:
$7.42B
ASML:
$8.87B
LRCX:
$5.00B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASML achieves a -4.15% return, which is significantly higher than LRCX's -4.78% return. Over the past 10 years, ASML has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 21.99%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.63% annualized return.
ASML
-4.15%
6.96%
-29.38%
-3.59%
20.55%
21.99%
LRCX
-4.78%
1.95%
-29.45%
-4.38%
21.70%
26.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASML vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASML vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than LRCX's 1.16% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.93% | 0.85% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.59% | 1.20% | 1.10% | 0.75% | 1.02% | 0.91% | 0.77% | 0.75% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 1.16% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% | 0.68% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ASML vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASML drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, roughly equal to the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML and LRCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ASML vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) is 6.65%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 13.30%. This indicates that ASML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ASML vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASML Holding N.V. and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities