ASML vs. LRCX

In the year-to-date period, ASML achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's -1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ASML has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 21.11%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.89% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ASML Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the LRCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASML and LRCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than LRCX's 1.26% yield.

The maximum ASML drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, roughly equal to the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML and LRCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) is 21.06%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 27.54%. This indicates that ASML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASML Holding N.V. and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.