PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLUT vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLUT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flutter Entertainment PLC (FLUT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLUT vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment PLC
-52.59%-16.80%44.39%32.84%-14.44%-23.51%79.04%51.44%-32.00%23.91%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-4.42%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%5.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLUT achieves a -52.59% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -4.42% return.


FLUT

1D
2.46%
1M
-3.95%
YTD
-52.59%
6M
-59.86%
1Y
-53.98%
3Y*
-17.51%
5Y*
-13.86%
10Y*

VOO

1D
2.86%
1M
-5.01%
YTD
-4.42%
6M
-1.84%
1Y
17.67%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
14.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLUT vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLUT
FLUT Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FLUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLUT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FLUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLUT Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLUT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flutter Entertainment PLC (FLUT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLUTVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.27

0.98

-2.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.90

1.50

-3.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

1.23

-0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

1.53

-2.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.82

7.29

-9.11

FLUT vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUT Sharpe Ratio is -1.27, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUT and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLUTVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.27

0.98

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

0.70

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.83

-0.79

Correlation

The correlation between FLUT and VOO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLUT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FLUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment PLC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.19%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Drawdowns

FLUT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUT drawdown since its inception was -67.76%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUT and VOO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLUTVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.76%

-33.99%

-33.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.76%

-11.98%

-55.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.76%

-24.52%

-43.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.96%

-6.29%

-60.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.56%

-3.72%

-18.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.53%

2.52%

+28.01%

Volatility

FLUT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Flutter Entertainment PLC (FLUT) has a higher volatility of 11.73% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.29%. This indicates that FLUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLUTVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.73%

5.29%

+6.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.69%

9.44%

+26.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.85%

18.10%

+24.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.98%

16.82%

+27.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.86%

17.99%

+28.87%