ASML vs. AMAT

In the year-to-date period, ASML achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly higher than AMAT's -7.45% return. Over the past 10 years, ASML has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 21.11%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.96% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ASML Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is comparable to the AMAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASML and AMAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than AMAT's 1.07% yield.

The maximum ASML drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than AMAT's maximum drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML and AMAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) is 21.06%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 23.72%. This indicates that ASML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASML Holding N.V. and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.