ASML vs. AMAT
Compare and contrast key facts about ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASML or AMAT.
Correlation
The correlation between ASML and AMAT is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ASML vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ASML:
-0.08
AMAT:
0.11
ASML:
0.20
AMAT:
0.44
ASML:
1.03
AMAT:
1.06
ASML:
-0.09
AMAT:
0.13
ASML:
-0.17
AMAT:
0.26
ASML:
20.55%
AMAT:
17.85%
ASML:
44.94%
AMAT:
42.43%
ASML:
-90.00%
AMAT:
-85.22%
ASML:
-34.24%
AMAT:
-33.68%
Fundamentals
ASML:
$289.08B
AMAT:
$138.60B
ASML:
$18.53
AMAT:
$8.61
ASML:
39.68
AMAT:
19.78
ASML:
1.87
AMAT:
1.68
ASML:
$26.24B
AMAT:
$27.18B
ASML:
$13.42B
AMAT:
$12.90B
ASML:
$8.87B
AMAT:
$8.26B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASML achieves a -4.15% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 4.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ASML having a 21.99% annualized return and AMAT not far ahead at 22.52%.
ASML
-4.15%
6.96%
-29.38%
-3.59%
20.55%
21.99%
AMAT
4.70%
-3.72%
-27.82%
4.71%
23.60%
22.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASML vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASML vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than AMAT's 0.90% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.93% | 0.85% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.59% | 1.20% | 1.10% | 0.75% | 1.02% | 0.91% | 0.77% | 0.75% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.90% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% | 1.61% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
ASML vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASML drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than AMAT's maximum drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML and AMAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ASML vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) is 6.65%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 9.62%. This indicates that ASML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ASML vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASML Holding N.V. and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities