FLUT vs. QQQ
FLUT (Flutter Entertainment PLC) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, FLUT returned -11.75%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLUT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLUT achieves a -53.17% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
FLUT
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -3.59%
- YTD
- -53.17%
- 6M
- -52.45%
- 1Y
- -59.16%
- 3Y*
- -20.40%
- 5Y*
- -11.75%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
FLUT vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLUT Flutter Entertainment PLC | -53.17% | -16.80% | 44.39% | 32.84% | -14.44% | -23.51% | 79.04% | 51.44% | -32.00% | 23.91% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 5.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLUT and QQQ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2017 | 0.24 |
The correlation between FLUT and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.35 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLUT vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
FLUT
QQQ
FLUT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flutter Entertainment PLC (FLUT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLUT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.71 | 1.45 | -0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 3.51 | -4.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 13.49 | -14.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLUT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.38 | 2.64 | -4.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | 0.81 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.41 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
FLUT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLUT drawdown since its inception was -70.06%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUT and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLUT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.06% | -82.97% | +12.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.06% | -11.96% | -58.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.06% | -22.77% | -47.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.06% | -35.12% | -34.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.37% | -0.26% | -67.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.62% | -32.79% | +9.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.33% | 3.11% | +38.22% |
Volatility
FLUT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Flutter Entertainment PLC (FLUT) has a higher volatility of 14.29% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that FLUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLUT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.29% | 4.49% | +9.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.53% | 12.10% | +21.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.89% | 15.94% | +26.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.23% | 22.38% | +21.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.81% | 22.29% | +24.52% |
Dividends
FLUT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
FLUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLUT Flutter Entertainment PLC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLUT and QQQ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLUT has higher volatility (14.29%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLUT dropped -70.06% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLUT and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer