PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLUT vs. TCEHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FLUT vs. TCEHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flutter Entertainment PLC (FLUT) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLUT achieves a -50.73% return, which is significantly lower than TCEHY's -17.30% return.


FLUT

1D
1.43%
1M
-0.07%
6M
-34.80%
YTD
-50.73%
1Y
-64.64%
3Y*
-17.97%
5Y*
-9.44%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.85%

TCEHY

1D
1.87%
1M
13.06%
6M
-16.99%
YTD
-17.30%
1Y
-6.77%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
11.56%
ALL TIME*
24.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$235.05M$225.07M$283.30M
$231.89M$226.40M$252.40M

FLUT vs. TCEHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment PLC
-50.73%-16.80%44.39%32.84%-14.44%-23.51%79.04%51.44%-32.00%23.91%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
-17.30%45.23%41.92%-5.48%-24.97%-18.69%50.09%21.93%-23.83%15.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FLUT and TCEHY is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2017

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLUT:

$18.38B

TCEHY:

$563.98B

EPS

FLUT:

-$3.81

TCEHY:

CN¥25.31

PS Ratio

FLUT:

0.74

TCEHY:

5.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLUT:

$17.02B

TCEHY:

CN¥763.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLUT:

$7.53B

TCEHY:

CN¥422.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

FLUT:

$1.32B

TCEHY:

CN¥324.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLUT vs. TCEHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLUT
FLUT Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FLUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLUT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FLUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLUT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

TCEHY
TCEHY Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
TCEHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCEHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCEHY Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TCEHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCEHY Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLUT vs. TCEHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flutter Entertainment PLC (FLUT) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLUTTCEHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.68

0.99

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

-0.18

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.32

-0.32

-1.00

FLUT vs. TCEHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUT Sharpe Ratio is -1.43, which is lower than the TCEHY Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUT and TCEHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLUT vs. TCEHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUT drawdown since its inception was -70.06%, roughly equal to the maximum TCEHY drawdown of -73.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUT and TCEHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLUTTCEHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.06%

-73.17%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.06%

-38.23%

-31.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.06%

-38.23%

-31.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.06%

-60.48%

-9.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.66%

-28.69%

-36.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.53%

-19.83%

-4.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.13%

21.29%

+27.84%

Volatility

FLUT vs. TCEHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Flutter Entertainment PLC (FLUT) is 11.67%, while Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) has a volatility of 13.15%. This indicates that FLUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCEHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLUTTCEHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.67%

13.15%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.35%

27.14%

+9.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.35%

33.63%

+11.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.51%

43.05%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.78%

39.03%

+7.75%

Dividends

FLUT vs. TCEHY - Dividend Comparison

FLUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TCEHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment PLC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
1.08%0.76%0.82%6.67%4.15%0.35%0.19%0.23%0.26%0.29%0.51%0.21%

Financials

FLUT vs. TCEHY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flutter Entertainment PLC and Tencent Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

FLUT vs. TCEHY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Flutter Entertainment PLC and Tencent Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

FLUT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flutter Entertainment PLC reported a gross profit of 1.84B and revenue of 4.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.7%.

TCEHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 106.58B and revenue of 195.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.

FLUT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flutter Entertainment PLC reported an operating income of 79.00M and revenue of 4.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.8%.

TCEHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 65.72B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.7%.

FLUT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flutter Entertainment PLC reported a net income of 218.00M and revenue of 4.30B, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.

TCEHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a net income of 57.74B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in a net margin of 29.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FLUT and TCEHY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCEHY has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to FLUT (11.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLUT dropped -70.06% vs TCEHY's -73.17%.

TCEHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLUT and TCEHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer