FLTR vs. RBIL
FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLTR returned 5.30% vs 4.57% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. FLTR charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
FLTR vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTR achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.70% return.
FLTR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 3.51%
RBIL
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 1.91% | 4.29% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.70% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTR and RBIL is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLTR vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
FLTR
RBIL
FLTR vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLTR | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.15 | 2.39 | +0.76 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.96 | 17.00 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 101.23 | 70.66 | +30.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLTR | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.77 | 5.01 | +1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 4.28 | -3.75 |
Drawdowns
FLTR vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTR drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLTR | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.84% | -0.50% | -17.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.31% | -0.27% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | 0.00% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -0.06% | -0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.07% | -0.02% |
Volatility
FLTR vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) is 0.25%, while F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) has a volatility of 0.30%. This indicates that FLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLTR | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.25% | 0.30% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.62% | 0.79% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79% | 0.92% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.13% | 1.05% | +1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 1.05% | +3.95% |
FLTR vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLTR vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than RBIL's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.73% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.60% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLTR and RBIL have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBIL has higher volatility (0.30%) compared to FLTR (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTR dropped -17.84% vs RBIL's -0.50%.
On 1-year performance, FLTR leads with 5.30% vs 4.57% for RBIL. On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FLTR has performed better with a 5.30% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RBIL.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 4.60% for RBIL.
FLTR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for FLTR and 0.17% for RBIL.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.77 vs 5.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLTR and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer