FLTR vs. BSCR
FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) and BSCR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - FLTR tracks the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index while BSCR tracks the NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLTR returned 4.50%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for BSCR. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLTR charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCR.
Performance
FLTR vs. BSCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTR achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly higher than BSCR's 1.27% return.
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.50%
BSCR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 4.46%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- 1.41%
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR vs. BSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 1.95% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 1.44% | 5.70% | 0.30% | 0.67% |
BSCR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.27% | 5.77% | 4.52% | 6.41% | -9.56% | -1.72% | 9.68% | 14.88% | -2.63% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTR and BSCR is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLTR vs. BSCR — Risk / Return Rank
FLTR
BSCR
FLTR vs. BSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLTR | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.15 | 2.10 | +1.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.96 | 10.69 | +6.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 101.22 | 46.31 | +54.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLTR | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.77 | 4.20 | +2.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.12 | 0.35 | +1.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.59 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
FLTR vs. BSCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTR drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, roughly equal to the maximum BSCR drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR and BSCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLTR | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.84% | -17.26% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.31% | -0.42% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.93% | -2.41% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.06% | -14.87% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -3.34% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.10% | -0.05% |
Volatility
FLTR vs. BSCR - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) has a higher volatility of 0.25% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) at 0.19%. This indicates that FLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLTR | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.25% | 0.19% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.62% | 0.59% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79% | 1.07% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.13% | 4.09% | -1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 5.35% | -0.35% |
FLTR vs. BSCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCR's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLTR vs. BSCR - Dividend Comparison
FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than BSCR's 4.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.29% | 4.26% | 4.27% | 3.74% | 2.65% | 2.12% | 2.46% | 3.11% | 3.35% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.73% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLTR and BSCR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLTR has higher volatility (0.25%) compared to BSCR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTR dropped -17.84% vs BSCR's -17.26%.
On 5-year performance, FLTR leads with 4.50% vs 1.41% for BSCR. On fees, BSCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLTR has performed better with a 4.50% return vs 1.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for FLTR.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 4.29% for BSCR.
FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index, while BSCR tracks NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for FLTR and 0.10% for BSCR.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.77 vs 4.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLTR and BSCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer