BSCR vs. BSCS
BSCR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF) and BSCS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds from Invesco - BSCR tracks the NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index while BSCS tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2028 TR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSCR returned 1.47%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for BSCS. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
BSCR vs. BSCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCR achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than BSCS's 0.81% return.
BSCR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCR vs. BSCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.27% | 5.77% | 4.52% | 6.41% | -9.56% | -1.72% | 9.68% | 14.88% | 0.08% |
BSCS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.81% | 7.04% | 3.87% | 7.62% | -11.24% | -1.89% | 10.17% | 15.41% | -0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCR and BSCS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2018 | 0.89 |
The correlation between BSCR and BSCS shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BSCR vs. BSCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCR
BSCS
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
BSCR
BSCS
Consumer Cyclical
BSCR
BSCS
Healthcare
BSCR
BSCS
Technology
BSCR
BSCS
Industrials
BSCR
BSCS
Consumer Defensive
BSCR
BSCS
Communication Services
BSCR
BSCS
Energy
BSCR
BSCS
Utilities
BSCR
BSCS
Real Estate
BSCR
BSCS
Basic Materials
BSCR
BSCS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCR vs. BSCS — Risk / Return Rank
BSCR
BSCS
BSCR vs. BSCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCR | BSCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.26 | 2.75 | +1.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 7.98 | 4.60 | +3.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.11 | 1.58 | +0.53 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.03 | 4.17 | +6.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 46.87 | 17.91 | +28.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCR | BSCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.26 | 2.75 | +1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.30 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.60 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
BSCR vs. BSCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCR drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, smaller than the maximum BSCS drawdown of -18.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCR and BSCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCR | BSCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.26% | -18.40% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.42% | -1.08% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.41% | -3.14% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.87% | -17.63% | +2.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.05% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -4.20% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.10% | 0.25% | -0.15% |
Volatility
BSCR vs. BSCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) is 0.19%, while Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) has a volatility of 0.38%. This indicates that BSCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCR | BSCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.19% | 0.38% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.59% | 1.02% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08% | 1.69% | -0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.09% | 4.92% | -0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.35% | 6.24% | -0.89% |
BSCR vs. BSCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BSCR and BSCS have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCR vs. BSCS - Dividend Comparison
BSCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, less than BSCS's 4.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.29% | 4.26% | 4.27% | 3.74% | 2.65% | 2.12% | 2.46% | 3.11% | 3.35% | 0.78% |
BSCS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.46% | 4.46% | 4.54% | 3.90% | 2.72% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 3.04% | 1.42% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCR and BSCS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSCS has higher volatility (0.38%) compared to BSCR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCR dropped -17.26% vs BSCS's -18.40%.
On 5-year performance, BSCS leads with 1.47% vs 1.47% for BSCR. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, BSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BSCS has performed better with a 1.47% return vs 1.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCR and BSCS have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
BSCS has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 4.29% for BSCR.
BSCR tracks NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index, while BSCS tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2028 TR Index.
BSCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.25 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCR and BSCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer