PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCR vs. AGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCR vs. AGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCR achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's 0.47% return.


BSCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.74%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
1.47%
10Y*

AGG

1D
0.03%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.49%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
1.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCR vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
1.27%5.77%4.52%6.41%-9.56%-1.72%9.68%14.88%-2.63%0.81%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.47%7.19%1.31%5.65%-13.02%-1.77%7.48%8.46%0.09%0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCR and AGG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between BSCR and AGG has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCR vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCR
BSCR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCR vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCRAGGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.26

1.38

+2.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

7.98

2.06

+5.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.11

1.25

+0.86

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

11.03

1.81

+9.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

46.87

5.61

+41.26

BSCR vs. AGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCR Sharpe Ratio is 4.26, which is higher than the AGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCR and AGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCRAGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.26

1.38

+2.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.04

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.59

0.00

Drawdowns

BSCR vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCR drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, smaller than the maximum AGG drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCR and AGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCRAGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.26%

-18.43%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.42%

-2.76%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.41%

-6.11%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.87%

-17.82%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.93%

+1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-2.71%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

0.89%

-0.79%

Volatility

BSCR vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) is 0.19%, while iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that BSCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCRAGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.19%

1.32%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.59%

2.76%

-2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08%

3.85%

-2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.09%

6.09%

-2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.35%

5.41%

-0.06%

BSCR vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCR vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison

BSCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than AGG's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.98%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
4.29%4.26%4.27%3.74%2.65%2.12%2.46%3.11%3.35%0.78%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCR and AGG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGG has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to BSCR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCR dropped -17.26% vs AGG's -18.43%.

On 5-year performance, BSCR leads with 1.47% vs 0.23% for AGG. On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BSCR has performed better with a 1.47% return vs 0.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCR.

BSCR has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 3.98% for AGG.

BSCR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while AGG is Total Bond Market. BSCR tracks NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index, while AGG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCR and 0.03% for AGG.

BSCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.25 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCR and AGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer