PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSW vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSW vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSW achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 10.55% return.


FLSW

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
4.52%
6M
3.79%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*

LVHD

1D
1.56%
1M
1.00%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.56%
1Y
13.38%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*
8.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSW vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLSW
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
4.52%32.92%-1.77%16.79%-18.14%20.82%13.25%31.66%-7.85%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
10.55%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSW and LVHD is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018

0.50

The correlation between FLSW and LVHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLSW vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLSW
LVHD

Healthcare

37.3%
4.4%

Financial Services

17.6%
8.2%

Industrials

14.1%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

13.7%
21.8%

Basic Materials

7.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
7.4%

Technology

1.3%
3.1%

Real Estate

1.2%
15.4%

Communication Services

1.2%
2.6%

Utilities

0.2%
24.8%

Energy

-

7.4%

Healthcare

FLSW
37.3%
LVHD
4.4%

Financial Services

FLSW
17.6%
LVHD
8.2%

Industrials

FLSW
14.1%
LVHD
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

FLSW
13.7%
LVHD
21.8%

Basic Materials

FLSW
7.8%
LVHD

-

Consumer Cyclical

FLSW
5.7%
LVHD
7.4%

Technology

FLSW
1.3%
LVHD
3.1%

Real Estate

FLSW
1.2%
LVHD
15.4%

Communication Services

FLSW
1.2%
LVHD
2.6%

Utilities

FLSW
0.2%
LVHD
24.8%

Energy

FLSW

-

LVHD
7.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSW vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSW
FLSW Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FLSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSW Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSW Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSW vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLSWLVHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.23

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

2.18

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.20

5.41

-1.22

FLSW vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSW Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSW and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLSW vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSW drawdown since its inception was -28.16%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSW and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSWLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.16%

-37.32%

+9.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.38%

-6.17%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.38%

-14.29%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.16%

-16.75%

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.81%

-1.43%

-2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-4.04%

-1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

2.48%

+1.73%

Volatility

FLSW vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) at 4.05%. This indicates that FLSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSWLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

4.05%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.43%

7.26%

+5.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

9.98%

+5.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.76%

12.91%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

15.53%

+1.35%

FLSW vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLSW vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

FLSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than LVHD's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLSW
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
0.12%2.12%2.04%2.36%2.02%1.86%2.28%1.15%2.86%0.00%0.00%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.29%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLSW and LVHD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLSW has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to LVHD (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSW dropped -28.16% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

On 5-year performance, LVHD leads with 7.44% vs 7.06% for FLSW. On fees, FLSW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHD has performed better with a 7.44% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLSW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.12% for FLSW.

FLSW is categorized as Europe Equities, while LVHD is Dividend. FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index, while LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLSW and 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSW and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer