FLSW vs. FLJH

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FLSW (Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF) and FLJH (Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLSW is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index, while FLJH is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLSW returned 7.38%/yr vs 20.75%/yr for FLJH. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.

Performance

FLSW vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSW achieves a 3.42% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 19.46% return.

FLSW

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 1.15%
• YTD: 3.42%
• 6M: 7.16%
• 1Y: 14.26%
• 3Y*: 12.19%
• 5Y*: 7.38%
• 10Y*: —

FLJH

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 7.60%
• YTD: 19.46%
• 6M: 17.87%
• 1Y: 45.59%
• 3Y*: 27.69%
• 5Y*: 20.75%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSW vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF	3.42%	32.92%	-1.77%	16.79%	-18.14%	20.82%	13.25%	31.66%	-7.85%
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	19.46%	25.26%	25.89%	36.02%	-2.75%	12.68%	10.65%	20.34%	-13.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSW and FLJH is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018	0.43

FLSW vs. FLJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLSW	FLJH
Healthcare	37.4%	5.9%
Financial Services	18.0%	15.9%
Consumer Defensive	14.0%	4.2%
Industrials	13.8%	26.6%
Basic Materials	7.7%	4.3%
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	12.8%
Real Estate	1.3%	3.4%
Communication Services	1.2%	7.1%
Technology	1.1%	17.4%
Utilities	0.2%	1.3%
Energy	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

FLSW vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSW

FLSW Risk / Return Rank: 25
FLSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FLSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FLSW Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FLSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FLSW Martin Ratio Rank: 26

FLJH

FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 79
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSW vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLSW	FLJH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	2.55	-1.62
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	3.53	-2.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.47	-0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	4.28	-3.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.63	16.79	-13.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLSW vs. FLJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSW Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSW and FLJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLSW	FLJH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	2.55	-1.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	1.13	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.74	-0.17

Drawdowns

FLSW vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSW drawdown since its inception was -28.16%, smaller than the maximum FLJH drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSW and FLJH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLSW	FLJH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.16%	-31.51%	+3.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.38%	-10.80%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.38%	-20.39%	+7.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.16%	-20.39%	-7.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.81%	0.00%	-4.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.96%	-5.32%	-0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.09%	2.75%	+1.34%

Volatility

FLSW vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) at 3.48%. This indicates that FLSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLSW	FLJH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.13%	3.48%	+1.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.06%	13.42%	-1.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.46%	17.97%	-2.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.69%	18.51%	-2.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	19.83%	-2.95%

FLSW vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLSW and FLJH have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLSW vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

FLSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than FLJH's 3.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	3.27%	3.90%	5.06%	25.59%	26.67%	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	5.92%	0.10%
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF	2.05%	2.12%	2.04%	2.36%	2.02%	1.86%	2.28%	1.15%	2.86%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLSW and FLJH in my portfolio?

FLSW and FLJH have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLSW or FLJH?

FLSW has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to FLJH (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSW dropped -28.16% vs FLJH's -31.51%.

Which ETF is better, FLSW or FLJH?

On 5-year performance, FLJH leads with 20.75% vs 7.38% for FLSW. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLJH has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLSW or FLJH?

Over the 5-year period, FLJH has performed better with a 20.75% return vs 7.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLSW or FLJH?

FLSW and FLJH have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLSW or FLJH?

FLJH has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 2.05% for FLSW.

What is the main difference between FLSW and FLJH?

FLSW is categorized as Europe Equities, while FLJH is Japan Equities. FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index, while FLJH tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.