PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FLSW vs. UNA.AS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLSW vs. UNA.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Unilever PLC (UNA.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.53%
6.70%
FLSW
UNA.AS

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSW achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than UNA.AS's 28.59% return.


FLSW

YTD

0.78%

1M

-7.08%

6M

0.27%

1Y

8.84%

5Y (annualized)

6.78%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

UNA.AS

YTD

28.59%

1M

-4.42%

6M

10.51%

1Y

29.28%

5Y (annualized)

4.25%

10Y (annualized)

8.73%

Key characteristics


FLSWUNA.AS
Sharpe Ratio0.781.91
Sortino Ratio1.153.26
Omega Ratio1.131.40
Calmar Ratio0.790.44
Martin Ratio2.8210.00
Ulcer Index3.35%2.87%
Daily Std Dev12.11%14.98%
Max Drawdown-28.16%-92.87%
Current Drawdown-10.36%-54.31%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between FLSW and UNA.AS is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLSW vs. UNA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Unilever PLC (UNA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLSW, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.641.55
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLSW, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.962.58
The chart of Omega ratio for FLSW, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.111.32
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLSW, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.721.51
The chart of Martin ratio for FLSW, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.297.00
FLSW
UNA.AS

The current FLSW Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the UNA.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSW and UNA.AS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.64
1.55
FLSW
UNA.AS

Dividends

FLSW vs. UNA.AS - Dividend Comparison

FLSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than UNA.AS's 3.18% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FLSW
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
2.09%2.36%2.02%1.86%2.28%1.15%2.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UNA.AS
Unilever PLC
3.18%3.89%3.64%3.63%3.31%3.16%3.21%2.95%3.23%2.92%3.46%3.59%

Drawdowns

FLSW vs. UNA.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSW drawdown since its inception was -28.16%, smaller than the maximum UNA.AS drawdown of -92.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSW and UNA.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-10.36%
-11.95%
FLSW
UNA.AS

Volatility

FLSW vs. UNA.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) is 3.70%, while Unilever PLC (UNA.AS) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that FLSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.70%
6.31%
FLSW
UNA.AS