PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSA vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSA vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSA achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 6.72% return.


FLSA

1D
-1.27%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
5.04%
6M
4.94%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
0.78%
5Y*
2.65%
10Y*

LVHD

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
6.72%
6M
6.51%
1Y
9.60%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
8.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSA vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLSA
Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF
5.04%-7.15%-0.29%12.99%-3.58%35.72%3.73%9.46%2.95%
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
6.72%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSA and LVHD is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2018

0.28

The correlation between FLSA and LVHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLSA vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLSA
LVHD

Financial Services

40.5%
8.6%

Basic Materials

15.7%

-

Energy

13.9%
6.7%

Communication Services

9.4%
3.8%

Utilities

4.7%
25.5%

Industrials

3.7%
4.6%

Healthcare

3.5%
4.6%

Real Estate

3.0%
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
18.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
6.8%

Technology

1.3%
5.9%

Financial Services

FLSA
40.5%
LVHD
8.6%

Basic Materials

FLSA
15.7%
LVHD

-

Energy

FLSA
13.9%
LVHD
6.7%

Communication Services

FLSA
9.4%
LVHD
3.8%

Utilities

FLSA
4.7%
LVHD
25.5%

Industrials

FLSA
3.7%
LVHD
4.6%

Healthcare

FLSA
3.5%
LVHD
4.6%

Real Estate

FLSA
3.0%
LVHD
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

FLSA
2.4%
LVHD
18.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FLSA
1.7%
LVHD
6.8%

Technology

FLSA
1.3%
LVHD
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSA vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSA
FLSA Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FLSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSA Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSA Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSA vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSALVHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.26

1.01

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.55

1.51

-0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.17

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

1.56

-1.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.85

3.98

-3.13

FLSA vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSA and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSALVHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

1.01

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.47

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.56

-0.20

Drawdowns

FLSA vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSA drawdown since its inception was -38.31%, roughly equal to the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSA and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSALVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.31%

-37.32%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-6.17%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-14.29%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.25%

-16.75%

-10.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.86%

-4.84%

-11.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.20%

-4.05%

-8.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.03%

2.42%

+2.61%

Volatility

FLSA vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) at 2.86%. This indicates that FLSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSALVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

2.86%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.08%

6.64%

+5.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.40%

9.52%

+6.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

12.87%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.41%

15.50%

+3.91%

FLSA vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLSA vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

FLSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than LVHD's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLSA
Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF
3.82%4.01%3.01%3.09%1.90%1.95%2.16%3.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
3.40%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLSA and LVHD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLSA has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to LVHD (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSA dropped -38.31% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

On 5-year performance, LVHD leads with 6.06% vs 2.65% for FLSA. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHD has performed better with a 6.06% return vs 2.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FLSA.

FLSA has the higher dividend yield at 3.82%, compared with 3.40% for LVHD.

FLSA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while LVHD is Volatility Hedged Equity. FLSA tracks FTSE Saudi Arabia RIC Capped Index, while LVHD tracks QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FLSA and 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSA and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer