PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSA vs. KSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSA vs. KSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) and iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLSA having a 6.39% return and KSA slightly lower at 6.32%.


FLSA

1D
1.59%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
6.39%
6M
6.42%
1Y
5.21%
3Y*
1.21%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*

KSA

1D
1.71%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
6.32%
6M
5.94%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
0.95%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*
7.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSA vs. KSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLSA
Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF
6.39%-7.15%-0.29%12.99%-3.58%35.72%3.73%9.46%2.95%
KSA
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
6.32%-8.20%-0.19%15.05%-6.06%33.62%2.65%9.30%3.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSA and KSA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2018

0.92

The correlation between FLSA and KSA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLSA vs. KSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLSA
KSA

Financial Services

40.5%
39.7%

Basic Materials

15.7%
13.3%

Energy

13.9%
13.0%

Communication Services

9.4%
8.2%

Utilities

4.7%
4.6%

Industrials

3.7%
4.4%

Healthcare

3.5%
4.3%

Real Estate

3.0%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
2.3%

Technology

1.3%
2.2%

Financial Services

FLSA
40.5%
KSA
39.7%

Basic Materials

FLSA
15.7%
KSA
13.3%

Energy

FLSA
13.9%
KSA
13.0%

Communication Services

FLSA
9.4%
KSA
8.2%

Utilities

FLSA
4.7%
KSA
4.6%

Industrials

FLSA
3.7%
KSA
4.4%

Healthcare

FLSA
3.5%
KSA
4.3%

Real Estate

FLSA
3.0%
KSA
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

FLSA
2.4%
KSA
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FLSA
1.7%
KSA
2.3%

Technology

FLSA
1.3%
KSA
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSA vs. KSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSA
FLSA Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FLSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSA Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSA Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

KSA
KSA Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
KSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
KSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSA Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSA vs. KSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) and iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSAKSADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.32

0.27

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.64

0.56

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.06

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

0.34

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.91

0.77

+0.14

FLSA vs. KSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is comparable to the KSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSA and KSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSAKSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

0.27

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.14

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.31

+0.06

Drawdowns

FLSA vs. KSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSA drawdown since its inception was -38.31%, smaller than the maximum KSA drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSA and KSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSAKSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.31%

-40.56%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-11.62%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-15.56%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.25%

-28.08%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.77%

-15.62%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.20%

-11.43%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

5.17%

-0.15%

Volatility

FLSA vs. KSA - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) and iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) have volatilities of 3.70% and 3.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSAKSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

3.78%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

12.18%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

16.63%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.71%

15.87%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.41%

20.04%

-0.63%

FLSA vs. KSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than KSA's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLSA vs. KSA - Dividend Comparison

FLSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than KSA's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLSA
Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF
3.77%4.01%3.01%3.09%1.90%1.95%2.16%3.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KSA
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
2.77%2.95%3.44%2.44%1.93%1.58%1.76%2.15%2.51%2.30%3.05%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FLSA and KSA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

KSA has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to FLSA (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSA dropped -38.31% vs KSA's -40.56%.

On 5-year performance, FLSA leads with 3.01% vs 2.27% for KSA. On fees, FLSA is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLSA has performed better with a 3.01% return vs 2.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLSA is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for KSA.

FLSA has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 2.77% for KSA.

FLSA tracks FTSE Saudi Arabia RIC Capped Index, while KSA tracks MSCI Saudi Arabia Investable Market Index (IMI) 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FLSA and 0.74% for KSA.

FLSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSA and KSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer