FLSA vs. AAPL
FLSA (Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Saudi Arabia RIC Capped Index, while AAPL (Apple Inc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FLSA returned 2.45%/yr vs 16.89%/yr for AAPL. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLSA vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLSA achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 16.94% return.
FLSA
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- 6M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 1Y
- -0.78%
- 3Y*
- -1.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.45%
- 10Y*
- —
AAPL
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 22.15%
- YTD
- 16.94%
- 1Y
- 50.87%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- 16.89%
- 10Y*
- 30.30%
FLSA vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSA Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF | 3.65% | -7.15% | -0.29% | 12.99% | -3.58% | 35.72% | 3.73% | 9.46% | 2.78% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 16.94% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -26.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLSA and AAPL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2018 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLSA vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
FLSA
AAPL
FLSA vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLSA | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.39 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 3.70 | -3.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | 8.82 | -8.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLSA vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLSA drawdown since its inception was -38.31%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSA and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLSA | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.31% | -81.80% | +43.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -13.80% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -33.36% | +18.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.25% | -33.36% | +6.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.97% | 0.00% | -16.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.24% | -29.55% | +17.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.25% | 5.78% | -0.53% |
Volatility
FLSA vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) is 3.30%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 9.95%. This indicates that FLSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLSA | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 9.95% | -6.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 18.77% | -6.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.29% | 24.11% | -7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 27.78% | -11.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 29.05% | -9.71% |
Dividends
FLSA vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
FLSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than AAPL's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.33% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
FLSA Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF | 3.12% | 4.01% | 3.01% | 3.09% | 1.90% | 1.95% | 2.16% | 3.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLSA and AAPL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPL has higher volatility (9.95%) compared to FLSA (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSA dropped -38.31% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLSA and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer