FLQL vs. SMST
FLQL (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF) and SMST (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLQL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while SMST is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. FLQL is passively managed, while SMST is actively managed. Over the past year, FLQL returned 22.61% vs 128.37% for SMST. Their -0.44 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FLQL charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for SMST.
Performance
FLQL vs. SMST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a 11.68% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -35.77% return.
FLQL
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 8.79%
- YTD
- 11.68%
- 1Y
- 22.61%
- 3Y*
- 20.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.53%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.62%
SMST
- 1D
- 8.37%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- 6M
- -29.35%
- YTD
- -35.77%
- 1Y
- 128.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -83.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.90M | $6.01M | $6.42M | |
| $15.35M | $15.12M | $17.58M |
FLQL vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF | 11.68% | 19.64% | 4.18% |
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF | -35.77% | -44.36% | -91.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLQL and SMST is -0.45, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024 | -0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLQL vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank
FLQL
SMST
FLQL vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLQL | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 2.00 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.31 | 3.68 | +6.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLQL vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and SMST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLQL | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.64% | -99.25% | +65.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -85.39% | +76.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -97.48% | +95.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -91.08% | +87.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 46.35% | -44.31% |
Volatility
FLQL vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) is 4.39%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 38.14%. This indicates that FLQL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLQL | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | 38.14% | -33.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.43% | 135.29% | -123.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.10% | 151.04% | -136.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 166.75% | -150.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 166.75% | -149.26% |
FLQL vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLQL vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison
FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.13% | 1.50% | 2.07% | 1.81% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.82% | 1.22% |
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLQL and SMST have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMST has higher volatility (38.14%) compared to FLQL (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQL dropped -33.64% vs SMST's -99.25%.
On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 128.37% vs 22.61% for FLQL. On fees, FLQL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLQL has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 128.37% return vs 22.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLQL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.
FLQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.
FLQL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLQL and 1.29% for SMST.
FLQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLQL and SMST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer