SMST vs. MSTZ
SMST (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMST returned 11.34% vs 23.54% for MSTZ. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SMST charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
SMST vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SMST having a -43.73% return and MSTZ slightly higher at -41.87%.
SMST
- 1D
- -7.77%
- 1M
- -6.06%
- YTD
- -43.73%
- 6M
- 65.04%
- 1Y
- 11.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ
- 1D
- -8.03%
- 1M
- -4.68%
- YTD
- -41.87%
- 6M
- 74.91%
- 1Y
- 23.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMST vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF | -43.73% | -44.36% | -90.81% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -41.87% | -38.95% | -94.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMST and MSTZ is 1.00 — these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2024 | 1.00 |
The correlation between SMST and MSTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMST vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
SMST
MSTZ
SMST vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMST | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.09 | 0.18 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 1.24 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.16 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | -0.11 | -0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | -0.18 | -0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMST | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | 0.18 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.53 | -0.54 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
SMST vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMST drawdown since its inception was -99.25%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMST and MSTZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMST | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.25% | -99.36% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.45% | -67.98% | -0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.79% | -97.96% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.98% | -94.00% | +4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.94% | 41.97% | +0.97% |
Volatility
SMST vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) have volatilities of 33.71% and 32.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMST | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.71% | 32.85% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 122.68% | 121.94% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 133.91% | 133.51% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 167.88% | 171.80% | -3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 167.88% | 171.80% | -3.92% |
SMST vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMST has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMST vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMST nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.