PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQL vs. DIVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLQL vs. DIVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a 13.02% return, which is significantly lower than DIVI's 14.46% return.


FLQL

1D
1.19%
1M
1.31%
6M
9.21%
YTD
13.02%
1Y
24.07%
3Y*
21.95%
5Y*
13.76%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.75%

DIVI

1D
0.53%
1M
1.96%
6M
7.57%
YTD
14.46%
1Y
30.10%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*
11.22%
ALL TIME*
11.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.65M$6.24M$8.16M
$7.69M$6.06M$6.47M

FLQL vs. DIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
13.02%19.64%24.33%23.58%-14.83%26.58%10.67%29.09%-2.79%15.04%
DIVI
Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
14.46%34.86%1.77%18.97%-1.21%16.95%1.29%22.98%-6.73%6.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQL and DIVI is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017

0.69

The correlation between FLQL and DIVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLQL vs. DIVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLQL
DIVI

Technology

39.4%
11.1%

Communication Services

10.5%
4.0%

Healthcare

10.2%
8.8%

Financial Services

9.6%
30.1%

Industrials

9.0%
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
6.6%

Real Estate

2.7%
2.3%

Energy

2.6%
4.0%

Utilities

2.0%
4.2%

Basic Materials

1.7%
5.5%

Technology

FLQL
39.4%
DIVI
11.1%

Communication Services

FLQL
10.5%
DIVI
4.0%

Healthcare

FLQL
10.2%
DIVI
8.8%

Financial Services

FLQL
9.6%
DIVI
30.1%

Industrials

FLQL
9.0%
DIVI
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FLQL
8.9%
DIVI
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

FLQL
3.4%
DIVI
6.6%

Real Estate

FLQL
2.7%
DIVI
2.3%

Energy

FLQL
2.6%
DIVI
4.0%

Utilities

FLQL
2.0%
DIVI
4.2%

Basic Materials

FLQL
1.7%
DIVI
5.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLQL vs. DIVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLQL
FLQL Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FLQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVI
DIVI Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DIVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVI Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLQL vs. DIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLQLDIVIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.87

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

11.24

+0.62

FLQL vs. DIVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQL Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the DIVI Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQL and DIVI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLQL vs. DIVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, which is greater than DIVI's maximum drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and DIVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQLDIVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-27.76%

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-10.54%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-14.58%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.41%

-18.53%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.14%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-3.59%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.68%

-0.65%

Volatility

FLQL vs. DIVI - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) have volatilities of 4.49% and 4.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLQLDIVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

4.35%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

13.29%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.09%

15.40%

-1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

15.48%

+0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

16.33%

+1.16%

FLQL vs. DIVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVI's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLQL vs. DIVI - Dividend Comparison

FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than DIVI's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIVI
Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
3.54%3.76%4.39%3.17%6.03%2.77%8.04%1.61%5.67%5.22%11.56%
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
1.02%1.10%1.13%1.50%2.07%1.81%1.99%1.78%1.82%1.22%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLQL and DIVI have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLQL has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to DIVI (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQL dropped -33.64% vs DIVI's -27.76%.

On 5-year performance, FLQL leads with 13.76% vs 13.57% for DIVI. On fees, DIVI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DIVI has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLQL has performed better with a 13.76% return vs 13.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLQL.

DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 1.02% for FLQL.

FLQL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DIVI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FLQL tracks LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while DIVI tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLQL and 0.09% for DIVI.

DIVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLQL and DIVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer