FLQL vs. BITY

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FLQL (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF) and BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLQL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while BITY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. FLQL is passively managed, while BITY is actively managed. Over the past year, FLQL returned 23.98% vs -46.57% for BITY. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLQL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BITY.

Performance

FLQL vs. BITY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly higher than BITY's -27.84% return.

FLQL

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 0.56%
• 6M: 9.66%
• YTD: 12.45%
• 1Y: 23.98%
• 3Y*: 21.29%
• 5Y*: 14.02%
• 10Y*: —

BITY

• 1D: -3.03%
• 1M: -3.75%
• 6M: -31.18%
• YTD: -27.84%
• 1Y: -46.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQL vs. BITY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF	12.45%	25.05%
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	-27.84%	-7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQL and BITY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

FLQL vs. BITY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQL

FLQL Risk / Return Rank: 71
FLQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FLQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FLQL Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FLQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FLQL Martin Ratio Rank: 80

BITY

BITY Risk / Return Rank: 1
BITY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQL vs. BITY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLQL	BITY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	-1.13	+2.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	-1.73	+4.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	0.81	+0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	-0.92	+3.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.14	-1.52	+13.66

FLQL vs. BITY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQL Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the BITY Sharpe Ratio of -1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQL and BITY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLQL vs. BITY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum BITY drawdown of -50.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and BITY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLQL	BITY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.64%	-50.87%	+17.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.05%	-50.87%	+41.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	-48.85%	+47.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-22.05%	+18.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	30.65%	-28.67%

Volatility

FLQL vs. BITY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) is 4.50%, while Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) has a volatility of 11.12%. This indicates that FLQL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLQL	BITY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.50%	11.12%	-6.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.14%	32.34%	-21.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.63%	41.37%	-27.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.25%	39.36%	-23.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.49%	39.36%	-21.87%

FLQL vs. BITY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BITY's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLQL vs. BITY - Dividend Comparison

FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than BITY's 40.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	40.57%	21.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF	1.03%	1.10%	1.13%	1.50%	2.07%	1.81%	1.99%	1.78%	1.82%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLQL and BITY in my portfolio?

FLQL and BITY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLQL or BITY?

BITY has higher volatility (11.12%) compared to FLQL (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQL dropped -33.64% vs BITY's -50.87%.

Which ETF is better, FLQL or BITY?

On 1-year performance, FLQL leads with 23.98% vs -46.57% for BITY. On fees, FLQL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLQL has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLQL or BITY?

Over the 1-year period, FLQL has performed better with a 23.98% return vs -46.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLQL or BITY?

FLQL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLQL or BITY?

BITY has the higher dividend yield at 40.57%, compared with 1.03% for FLQL.

What is the main difference between FLQL and BITY?

FLQL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BITY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLQL and 0.65% for BITY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.