PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITY vs. BCCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITY vs. BCCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITY achieves a -21.03% return, which is significantly lower than BCCC's -19.24% return.


BITY

1D
-6.46%
1M
-16.08%
YTD
-21.03%
6M
-23.28%
1Y
-34.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCCC

1D
-5.76%
1M
-11.60%
YTD
-19.24%
6M
-18.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITY vs. BCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BITY and BCCC is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

0.98

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITY vs. BCCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITY
BITY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BCCC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITY vs. BCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITYBCCCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.32

BITY vs. BCCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITYBCCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.66

-0.72

+0.06

Drawdowns

BITY vs. BCCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITY drawdown since its inception was -46.36%, which is greater than BCCC's maximum drawdown of -41.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITY and BCCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITYBCCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.36%

-41.62%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.03%

-35.46%

-8.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.58%

-16.76%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.33%

Volatility

BITY vs. BCCC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITYBCCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.86%

35.04%

+4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.02%

35.04%

+3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.02%

35.04%

+3.98%

BITY vs. BCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BCCC's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITY vs. BCCC - Dividend Comparison

BITY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.62%, less than BCCC's 60.77% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, BITY and BCCC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BITY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BITY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCCC.

BCCC has the higher dividend yield at 60.77%, compared with 38.62% for BITY.

BITY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BCCC is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITY and 0.75% for BCCC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITY and BCCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer