BITY vs. BCCC
BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) and BCCC (Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while BCCC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BITY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BCCC.
Performance
BITY vs. BCCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITY achieves a -21.03% return, which is significantly lower than BCCC's -19.24% return.
BITY
- 1D
- -6.46%
- 1M
- -16.08%
- YTD
- -21.03%
- 6M
- -23.28%
- 1Y
- -34.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCCC
- 1D
- -5.76%
- 1M
- -11.60%
- YTD
- -19.24%
- 6M
- -18.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITY vs. BCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | -21.03% | -17.94% |
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -19.24% | -7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITY and BCCC is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITY vs. BCCC — Risk / Return Rank
BITY
BCCC
BITY vs. BCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITY | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITY | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | -0.72 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
BITY vs. BCCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITY drawdown since its inception was -46.36%, which is greater than BCCC's maximum drawdown of -41.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITY and BCCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITY | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.36% | -41.62% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.03% | -35.46% | -8.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.58% | -16.76% | -2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.33% | — | — |
Volatility
BITY vs. BCCC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITY | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.89% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.86% | 35.04% | +4.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.02% | 35.04% | +3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.02% | 35.04% | +3.98% |
BITY vs. BCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BCCC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITY vs. BCCC - Dividend Comparison
BITY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.62%, less than BCCC's 60.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 60.77% | 29.55% |
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | 38.62% | 21.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, BITY and BCCC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BITY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BITY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCCC.
BCCC has the higher dividend yield at 60.77%, compared with 38.62% for BITY.
BITY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BCCC is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITY and 0.75% for BCCC.
Find the right allocation for BITY and BCCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer