PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLM vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLM vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FLM

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

GRID

1D
1.49%
1M
-1.17%
6M
10.03%
YTD
19.50%
1Y
30.04%
3Y*
22.76%
5Y*
14.44%
10Y*
18.61%
ALL TIME*
12.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$102.61M$99.71M$138.67M

FLM vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FLM and GRID is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026

0.24

FLM vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLM
GRID

Industrials

32.5%
23.6%

Energy

8.1%
1.6%

Technology

7.9%
12.6%

Basic Materials

7.4%
0.8%

Real Estate

5.7%

-

Communication Services

0.7%

-

Utilities

0.7%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

FLM
32.5%
GRID
23.6%

Energy

FLM
8.1%
GRID
1.6%

Technology

FLM
7.9%
GRID
12.6%

Basic Materials

FLM
7.4%
GRID
0.8%

Real Estate

FLM
5.7%
GRID

-

Communication Services

FLM
0.7%
GRID

-

Utilities

FLM
0.7%
GRID
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FLM

-

GRID
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

FLM

-

GRID

-

Financial Services

FLM

-

GRID

-

Healthcare

FLM

-

GRID

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLM vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLM vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLMGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.77

FLM vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLM vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLMGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.45%

Volatility

FLM vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLMGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.83%

FLM vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLM and GRID have an expense ratio of 0.70%.


Dividends

FLM vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

FLM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLM
First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.79%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLM and GRID have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.70% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLM and GRID have the same expense ratio: 0.70% per year.

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.00% for FLM.

FLM is categorized as Building & Construction, while GRID is Infrastructure Equities. FLM tracks ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLM and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer