FLM vs. NFTY
FLM (First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLM is a Building & Construction fund tracking the ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while NFTY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLM charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.
Performance
FLM vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FLM
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFTY
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- -7.30%
- 6M
- -7.62%
- 1Y
- -6.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.30%
- 5Y*
- 5.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
FLM vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF | -4.55% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLM and NFTY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026 | 0.22 |
FLM vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLM
NFTY
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
FLM
NFTY
Energy
FLM
NFTY
Technology
FLM
NFTY
Basic Materials
FLM
NFTY
Real Estate
FLM
NFTY
-
Communication Services
FLM
NFTY
Utilities
FLM
NFTY
Consumer Cyclical
FLM
-
NFTY
Consumer Defensive
FLM
-
NFTY
Financial Services
FLM
-
NFTY
Healthcare
FLM
-
NFTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLM vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank
FLM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NFTY
FLM vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLM | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.94 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLM vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLM drawdown since its inception was -4.55%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLM and NFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLM | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -47.67% | +43.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.55% | -15.26% | +10.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -9.60% | +7.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.56% | — |
Volatility
FLM vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLM | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.02% | 14.75% | +36.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 17.41% | +33.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 20.72% | +30.30% |
FLM vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLM vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison
FLM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.91% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLM and NFTY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLM is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLM is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.
NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.00% for FLM.
FLM is categorized as Building & Construction, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. FLM tracks ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FLM and 0.80% for NFTY.
Find the right allocation for FLM and NFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer