FLM vs. KNG
FLM (First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF) and KNG (FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLM is a Building & Construction fund tracking the ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Both are passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLM charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.
Performance
FLM vs. KNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FLM
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KNG
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 4.41%
- 1Y
- 10.46%
- 3Y*
- 7.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- —
FLM vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF | -4.55% |
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLM and KNG is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026 | 0.31 |
FLM vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLM
KNG
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
FLM
KNG
Energy
FLM
KNG
Technology
FLM
KNG
Basic Materials
FLM
KNG
Real Estate
FLM
KNG
Communication Services
FLM
KNG
-
Utilities
FLM
KNG
Consumer Cyclical
FLM
-
KNG
Consumer Defensive
FLM
-
KNG
Financial Services
FLM
-
KNG
Healthcare
FLM
-
KNG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLM vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank
FLM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KNG
FLM vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLM | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.22 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLM vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLM drawdown since its inception was -4.55%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLM and KNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLM | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -35.12% | +30.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.55% | -3.46% | -1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -4.13% | +1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.42% | — |
Volatility
FLM vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLM | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.02% | 10.41% | +40.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 13.58% | +37.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 17.15% | +33.87% |
FLM vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLM vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison
FLM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.45% | 8.61% | 9.08% | 5.91% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLM and KNG have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLM is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLM is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.
KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.45%, compared with 0.00% for FLM.
FLM is categorized as Building & Construction, while KNG is Dividend. FLM tracks ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FLM and 0.75% for KNG.
Find the right allocation for FLM and KNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer