GRID vs. PAVE
GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GRID returned 16.47%/yr vs 18.54%/yr for PAVE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GRID charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
GRID vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GRID having a 23.03% return and PAVE slightly lower at 22.22%.
GRID
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 23.03%
- 6M
- 21.65%
- 1Y
- 39.31%
- 3Y*
- 24.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.47%
- 10Y*
- 19.91%
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 22.22%
- 6M
- 19.45%
- 1Y
- 36.66%
- 3Y*
- 25.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.54%
- 10Y*
- —
GRID vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 23.03% | 29.65% | 15.18% | 21.57% | -13.89% | 27.65% | 48.84% | 42.80% | -22.69% | 27.91% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 22.22% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRID and PAVE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between GRID and PAVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
GRID vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GRID
PAVE
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
GRID
PAVE
Technology
GRID
PAVE
Utilities
GRID
PAVE
Consumer Cyclical
GRID
PAVE
-
Energy
GRID
PAVE
Basic Materials
GRID
PAVE
Communication Services
GRID
-
PAVE
-
Consumer Defensive
GRID
-
PAVE
Financial Services
GRID
-
PAVE
-
Healthcare
GRID
-
PAVE
-
Real Estate
GRID
-
PAVE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRID vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
GRID
PAVE
GRID vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRID | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 3.09 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.90 | 11.23 | +0.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRID vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRID | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -44.08% | +3.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -11.91% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -26.23% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -26.23% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.83% | -1.40% | -4.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -6.21% | -2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 3.27% | +0.04% |
Volatility
GRID vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a higher volatility of 10.09% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 7.04%. This indicates that GRID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRID | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.09% | 7.04% | +3.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.22% | 15.92% | +2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.25% | 19.60% | +1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.36% | 21.66% | -0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 24.39% | -1.60% |
GRID vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRID vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than PAVE's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 0.80% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.75% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRID and PAVE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRID has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to PAVE (7.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 18.54% vs 16.47% for GRID. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 7.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 18.54% return vs 16.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.
GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.75% for PAVE.
GRID is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRID and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer