PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLM vs. FIW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLM vs. FIW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and First Trust Water ETF (FIW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FLM

1D
-4.55%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FIW

1D
-0.49%
1M
3.24%
YTD
-2.68%
6M
-4.55%
1Y
0.63%
3Y*
7.75%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLM vs. FIW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FLM and FIW is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026

0.50

FLM vs. FIW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLM
FIW

Industrials

37.1%
54.1%

Energy

8.1%

-

Technology

7.9%
8.1%

Basic Materials

7.4%
5.4%

Real Estate

5.7%

-

Communication Services

0.7%

-

Utilities

0.7%
16.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.7%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

8.1%

Industrials

FLM
37.1%
FIW
54.1%

Energy

FLM
8.1%
FIW

-

Technology

FLM
7.9%
FIW
8.1%

Basic Materials

FLM
7.4%
FIW
5.4%

Real Estate

FLM
5.7%
FIW

-

Communication Services

FLM
0.7%
FIW

-

Utilities

FLM
0.7%
FIW
16.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FLM

-

FIW
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

FLM

-

FIW
2.7%

Financial Services

FLM

-

FIW

-

Healthcare

FLM

-

FIW
8.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLM vs. FIW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FIW
FIW Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIW Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIW Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLM vs. FIW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and First Trust Water ETF (FIW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLMFIWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.11

FLM vs. FIW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLM vs. FIW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLM drawdown since its inception was -4.55%, smaller than the maximum FIW drawdown of -52.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLM and FIW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLMFIWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-52.75%

+48.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.55%

-8.72%

+4.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-8.30%

+6.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.68%

Volatility

FLM vs. FIW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLMFIWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.02%

15.81%

+35.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.02%

18.39%

+32.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.02%

19.92%

+31.10%

FLM vs. FIW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FIW's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLM vs. FIW - Dividend Comparison

FLM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIW
First Trust Water ETF
0.78%0.69%0.69%0.68%0.67%0.37%0.56%0.55%0.73%1.13%0.51%0.76%
FLM
First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLM and FIW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FIW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FIW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FLM.

FIW has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for FLM.

FLM is categorized as Building & Construction, while FIW is Water Equities. FLM tracks ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while FIW tracks ISE Clean Edge Water Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FLM and 0.50% for FIW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLM and FIW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer