FLM vs. FIW
FLM (First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF) and FIW (First Trust Water ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLM is a Building & Construction fund tracking the ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while FIW is a Water Equities fund tracking the ISE Clean Edge Water Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLM charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FIW.
Performance
FLM vs. FIW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FLM
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIW
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- YTD
- -2.68%
- 6M
- -4.55%
- 1Y
- 0.63%
- 3Y*
- 7.75%
- 5Y*
- 5.83%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
FLM vs. FIW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF | -4.55% |
FIW First Trust Water ETF | 0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLM and FIW is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026 | 0.50 |
FLM vs. FIW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLM
FIW
Industrials
Energy
-
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
FLM
FIW
Energy
FLM
FIW
-
Technology
FLM
FIW
Basic Materials
FLM
FIW
Real Estate
FLM
FIW
-
Communication Services
FLM
FIW
-
Utilities
FLM
FIW
Consumer Cyclical
FLM
-
FIW
Consumer Defensive
FLM
-
FIW
Financial Services
FLM
-
FIW
-
Healthcare
FLM
-
FIW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLM vs. FIW — Risk / Return Rank
FLM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FIW
FLM vs. FIW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and First Trust Water ETF (FIW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLM | FIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.02 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.11 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLM vs. FIW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLM drawdown since its inception was -4.55%, smaller than the maximum FIW drawdown of -52.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLM and FIW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLM | FIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -52.75% | +48.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.55% | -8.72% | +4.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -8.30% | +6.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.68% | — |
Volatility
FLM vs. FIW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLM | FIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.02% | 15.81% | +35.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 18.39% | +32.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 19.92% | +31.10% |
FLM vs. FIW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FIW's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLM vs. FIW - Dividend Comparison
FLM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIW First Trust Water ETF | 0.78% | 0.69% | 0.69% | 0.68% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% | 0.55% | 0.73% | 1.13% | 0.51% | 0.76% |
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLM and FIW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FIW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FIW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FLM.
FIW has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for FLM.
FLM is categorized as Building & Construction, while FIW is Water Equities. FLM tracks ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while FIW tracks ISE Clean Edge Water Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FLM and 0.50% for FIW.
Find the right allocation for FLM and FIW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer