PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIW vs. AQWA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FIW vs. AQWA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Water ETF (FIW) and Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FIW vs. AQWA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FIW
First Trust Water ETF
-3.98%7.20%8.38%20.35%-15.70%18.18%
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
2.38%13.15%4.34%20.13%-19.89%15.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIW achieves a -3.98% return, which is significantly lower than AQWA's 2.38% return.


FIW

1D
0.96%
1M
-7.88%
YTD
-3.98%
6M
-7.06%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
8.37%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*
12.89%

AQWA

1D
1.25%
1M
-7.26%
YTD
2.38%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
14.19%
3Y*
11.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FIW vs. AQWA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIW has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than AQWA's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FIW vs. AQWA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIW
FIW Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIW Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIW Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

AQWA
AQWA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
AQWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQWA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
AQWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQWA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIW vs. AQWA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Water ETF (FIW) and Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIWAQWADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.21

0.88

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.46

1.38

-0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.17

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

1.28

-0.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.04

4.17

-3.13

FIW vs. AQWA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIW Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the AQWA Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIW and AQWA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIWAQWADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

0.88

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.37

+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between FIW and AQWA is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FIW vs. AQWA - Dividend Comparison

FIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than AQWA's 1.44% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIW
First Trust Water ETF
0.79%0.69%0.69%0.68%0.67%0.37%0.56%0.55%0.73%1.13%0.51%0.76%
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
1.44%1.47%1.40%1.53%1.56%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FIW vs. AQWA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIW drawdown since its inception was -52.75%, which is greater than AQWA's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIW and AQWA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FIWAQWADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.75%

-29.44%

-23.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.74%

-11.48%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.95%

-8.04%

-1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-8.27%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

3.51%

+0.50%

Volatility

FIW vs. AQWA - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Water ETF (FIW) and Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) have volatilities of 5.83% and 5.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FIWAQWADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.83%

5.57%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

10.03%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.65%

16.19%

+2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.30%

16.67%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.88%

16.67%

+3.21%