FIW vs. AQWA

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FIW (First Trust Water ETF) and AQWA (Global X Clean Water ETF) are both Water Equities funds - FIW tracks the ISE Clean Edge Water Index while AQWA tracks the Solactive Global Clean Water Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIW returned 6.35%/yr vs 5.74%/yr for AQWA. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

FIW vs. AQWA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Water ETF (FIW) and Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIW achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than AQWA's 4.00% return.

FIW

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: 6.12%
• YTD: 1.00%
• 6M: -1.09%
• 1Y: 2.83%
• 3Y*: 8.97%
• 5Y*: 6.35%
• 10Y*: 13.35%

AQWA

• 1D: 1.83%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 4.00%
• 6M: 2.32%
• 1Y: 4.98%
• 3Y*: 10.42%
• 5Y*: 5.74%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIW vs. AQWA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FIW First Trust Water ETF	1.00%	7.20%	8.38%	20.35%	-15.70%	18.68%
AQWA Global X Clean Water ETF	4.00%	13.15%	4.34%	20.13%	-19.89%	15.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FIW and AQWA is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2021	0.89

The correlation between FIW and AQWA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIW vs. AQWA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIW

FIW Risk / Return Rank: 11
FIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
FIW Omega Ratio Rank: 10
FIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FIW Martin Ratio Rank: 11

AQWA

AQWA Risk / Return Rank: 13
AQWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
AQWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
AQWA Omega Ratio Rank: 13
AQWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
AQWA Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIW vs. AQWA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Water ETF (FIW) and Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIW	AQWA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	0.34	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.37	0.58	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.07	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.21	0.41	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.49	0.92	-0.42

FIW vs. AQWA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIW Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the AQWA Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIW and AQWA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIW vs. AQWA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIW drawdown since its inception was -52.75%, which is greater than AQWA's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIW and AQWA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIW	AQWA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.75%	-29.44%	-23.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.81%	-12.34%	-1.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.32%	-14.55%	-3.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.53%	-29.44%	+0.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.28%	-6.57%	+1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.30%	-8.28%	-0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.73%	5.43%	+0.30%

Volatility

FIW vs. AQWA - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Water ETF (FIW) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) at 4.86%. This indicates that FIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AQWA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIW	AQWA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.25%	4.86%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.23%	11.43%	+0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.96%	14.66%	+1.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.43%	16.82%	+1.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.90%	16.67%	+3.23%

FIW vs. AQWA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FIW and AQWA have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

FIW vs. AQWA - Dividend Comparison

FIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than AQWA's 1.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AQWA Global X Clean Water ETF	1.41%	1.47%	1.40%	1.53%	1.56%	1.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FIW First Trust Water ETF	0.92%	0.69%	0.69%	0.68%	0.67%	0.37%	0.56%	0.55%	0.73%	1.13%	0.51%	0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIW and AQWA in my portfolio?

FIW and AQWA have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIW or AQWA?

FIW has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to AQWA (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIW dropped -52.75% vs AQWA's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, FIW or AQWA?

On 5-year performance, FIW leads with 6.35% vs 5.74% for AQWA. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, AQWA has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FIW or AQWA?

Over the 5-year period, FIW has performed better with a 6.35% return vs 5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIW or AQWA?

FIW and AQWA have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIW or AQWA?

AQWA has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.92% for FIW.

What is the main difference between FIW and AQWA?

FIW tracks ISE Clean Edge Water Index, while AQWA tracks Solactive Global Clean Water Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AQWA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.