FIW vs. CGW
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Water ETF (FIW) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW).
FIW and CGW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FIW is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the ISE Clean Edge Water Index. It was launched on May 8, 2007. CGW is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water Index. It was launched on May 14, 2007. Both FIW and CGW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FIW or CGW.
Correlation
The correlation between FIW and CGW is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FIW vs. CGW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FIW:
0.69
CGW:
0.50
FIW:
1.05
CGW:
0.78
FIW:
1.12
CGW:
1.09
FIW:
1.26
CGW:
0.50
FIW:
3.51
CGW:
2.17
FIW:
3.02%
CGW:
3.21%
FIW:
15.46%
CGW:
13.96%
FIW:
-52.75%
CGW:
-57.24%
FIW:
-7.61%
CGW:
-9.35%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIW achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than CGW's 4.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FIW has outperformed CGW with an annualized return of 12.78%, while CGW has yielded a comparatively lower 8.61% annualized return.
FIW
8.56%
-4.42%
0.93%
9.18%
12.12%
12.78%
CGW
4.66%
-5.13%
-1.75%
5.48%
7.64%
8.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIW vs. CGW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIW has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than CGW's 0.57% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FIW vs. CGW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Water ETF (FIW) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FIW vs. CGW - Dividend Comparison
FIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while CGW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIW First Trust Water ETF | 0.63% | 0.68% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% | 0.55% | 0.73% | 1.13% | 0.51% | 0.76% | 0.75% | 0.63% |
CGW Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF | 0.00% | 1.55% | 1.45% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.48% | 2.14% | 1.71% | 1.65% | 1.67% | 1.77% | 1.52% |
Drawdowns
FIW vs. CGW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIW drawdown since its inception was -52.75%, smaller than the maximum CGW drawdown of -57.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIW and CGW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FIW vs. CGW - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Water ETF (FIW) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) at 4.45%. This indicates that FIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.