PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLKR vs. FDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLKR vs. FDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 112.26% return, which is significantly higher than FDT's 26.48% return.


FLKR

1D
7.15%
1M
17.17%
YTD
112.26%
6M
128.12%
1Y
212.42%
3Y*
49.62%
5Y*
19.64%
10Y*

FDT

1D
2.64%
1M
3.53%
YTD
26.48%
6M
26.98%
1Y
53.96%
3Y*
28.59%
5Y*
13.14%
10Y*
11.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLKR vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
112.26%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%3.00%
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
26.48%52.21%6.97%15.03%-19.51%11.43%4.29%16.82%-19.98%2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and FDT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.73

The correlation between FLKR and FDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLKR vs. FDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLKR
FDT

Technology

62.9%
12.1%

Industrials

14.6%
32.4%

Financial Services

7.5%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
11.9%

Healthcare

2.4%
1.3%

Communication Services

2.0%
2.8%

Basic Materials

1.9%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
2.5%

Energy

0.7%
7.9%

Utilities

0.3%
4.8%

Real Estate

-

5.0%

Technology

FLKR
62.9%
FDT
12.1%

Industrials

FLKR
14.6%
FDT
32.4%

Financial Services

FLKR
7.5%
FDT
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FLKR
6.3%
FDT
11.9%

Healthcare

FLKR
2.4%
FDT
1.3%

Communication Services

FLKR
2.0%
FDT
2.8%

Basic Materials

FLKR
1.9%
FDT
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

FLKR
1.4%
FDT
2.5%

Energy

FLKR
0.7%
FDT
7.9%

Utilities

FLKR
0.3%
FDT
4.8%

Real Estate

FLKR

-

FDT
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLKR vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKR vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLKRFDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.49

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.29

4.04

+5.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.27

15.31

+16.96

FLKR vs. FDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 4.63, which is higher than the FDT Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and FDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than FDT's maximum drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and FDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLKRFDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-46.10%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.03%

-13.41%

-9.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-14.29%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.51%

-32.80%

-16.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-0.82%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.02%

-10.76%

-11.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.61%

3.54%

+3.07%

Volatility

FLKR vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 26.71% compared to First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) at 9.32%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLKRFDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.71%

9.32%

+17.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.52%

17.44%

+25.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.33%

19.76%

+26.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.77%

18.50%

+11.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.47%

18.63%

+9.84%

FLKR vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLKR vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than FDT's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
2.82%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
1.82%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLKR and FDT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (26.71%) compared to FDT (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs FDT's -46.10%.

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 19.64% vs 13.14% for FDT. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FDT has been the lower-risk option at 9.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 19.64% return vs 13.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.82% for FLKR.

FLKR is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FDT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.80% for FDT.

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLKR and FDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer