FDT vs. SCHF
FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FDT tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index while SCHF tracks the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDT returned 11.64%/yr vs 11.18%/yr for SCHF. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
FDT vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDT achieves a 26.09% return, which is significantly higher than SCHF's 17.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDT having a 11.64% annualized return and SCHF not far behind at 11.18%.
FDT
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 26.09%
- 6M
- 26.12%
- 1Y
- 54.27%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.64%
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 18.27%
- 1Y
- 36.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.18%
FDT vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 26.09% | 52.21% | 6.97% | 15.03% | -19.51% | 11.43% | 4.29% | 16.82% | -19.98% | 34.42% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 17.68% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDT and SCHF is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FDT and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDT vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDT
SCHF
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
FDT
SCHF
Technology
FDT
SCHF
Consumer Cyclical
FDT
SCHF
Financial Services
FDT
SCHF
Basic Materials
FDT
SCHF
Energy
FDT
SCHF
Real Estate
FDT
SCHF
Utilities
FDT
SCHF
Communication Services
FDT
SCHF
Consumer Defensive
FDT
SCHF
Healthcare
FDT
SCHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDT vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
FDT
SCHF
FDT vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDT | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.40 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 3.18 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.38 | 12.22 | +3.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDT vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDT drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDT and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDT | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.10% | -34.87% | -11.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -11.48% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.29% | -13.41% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.80% | -29.14% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.10% | -34.87% | -11.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | 0.00% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.75% | -7.36% | -3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 2.98% | +0.56% |
Volatility
FDT vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a higher volatility of 8.64% compared to Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) at 6.42%. This indicates that FDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDT | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.64% | 6.42% | +2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.40% | 14.43% | +2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.71% | 16.63% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 16.55% | +1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 17.21% | +1.41% |
FDT vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDT vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than SCHF's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.82% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.90% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FDT and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FDT has higher volatility (8.64%) compared to SCHF (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDT dropped -46.10% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 10-year performance, FDT leads with 11.64% vs 11.18% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHF has been the lower-risk option at 6.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FDT has performed better with a 11.64% return vs 11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.82% for FDT.
FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDT and 0.06% for SCHF.
FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDT and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer