PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDT vs. SCHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDT vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDT achieves a 26.09% return, which is significantly higher than SCHF's 17.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDT having a 11.64% annualized return and SCHF not far behind at 11.18%.


FDT

1D
0.40%
1M
2.82%
YTD
26.09%
6M
26.12%
1Y
54.27%
3Y*
29.97%
5Y*
13.51%
10Y*
11.64%

SCHF

1D
0.21%
1M
3.82%
YTD
17.68%
6M
18.27%
1Y
36.30%
3Y*
20.89%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDT vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
26.09%52.21%6.97%15.03%-19.51%11.43%4.29%16.82%-19.98%34.42%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
17.68%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FDT and SCHF is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011

0.91

The correlation between FDT and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDT vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDT
SCHF

Industrials

32.4%
18.1%

Technology

12.1%
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
7.3%

Financial Services

9.9%
23.3%

Basic Materials

9.4%
7.4%

Energy

7.9%
4.7%

Real Estate

5.0%
2.0%

Utilities

4.8%
3.2%

Communication Services

2.8%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
5.7%

Healthcare

1.3%
7.0%

Industrials

FDT
32.4%
SCHF
18.1%

Technology

FDT
12.1%
SCHF
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FDT
11.9%
SCHF
7.3%

Financial Services

FDT
9.9%
SCHF
23.3%

Basic Materials

FDT
9.4%
SCHF
7.4%

Energy

FDT
7.9%
SCHF
4.7%

Real Estate

FDT
5.0%
SCHF
2.0%

Utilities

FDT
4.8%
SCHF
3.2%

Communication Services

FDT
2.8%
SCHF
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

FDT
2.5%
SCHF
5.7%

Healthcare

FDT
1.3%
SCHF
7.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDT vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDT vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDTSCHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.40

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

3.18

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.38

12.22

+3.17

FDT vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDT Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDT and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDT vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDT drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDT and SCHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTSCHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.10%

-34.87%

-11.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-11.48%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-13.41%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.80%

-29.14%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.10%

-34.87%

-11.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

0.00%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.75%

-7.36%

-3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

2.98%

+0.56%

Volatility

FDT vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a higher volatility of 8.64% compared to Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) at 6.42%. This indicates that FDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTSCHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.64%

6.42%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.40%

14.43%

+2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.71%

16.63%

+3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.47%

16.55%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

17.21%

+1.41%

FDT vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDT vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than SCHF's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
2.82%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.90%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FDT and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDT has higher volatility (8.64%) compared to SCHF (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDT dropped -46.10% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

On 10-year performance, FDT leads with 11.64% vs 11.18% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHF has been the lower-risk option at 6.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDT has performed better with a 11.64% return vs 11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.82% for FDT.

FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDT and 0.06% for SCHF.

FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDT and SCHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer