FDT vs. FIDZX
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (FIDZX).
FDT is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2011. FIDZX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 1, 2017.
Performance
FDT vs. FIDZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDT vs. FIDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 9.83% | 52.21% | 6.97% | 15.03% | -19.51% | 11.43% | 4.29% | 16.82% | -19.98% | 26.46% |
FIDZX Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z | -8.14% | 18.83% | 8.15% | 27.79% | -26.45% | 12.40% | 22.36% | 32.97% | -12.72% | 28.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDT achieves a 9.83% return, which is significantly higher than FIDZX's -8.14% return.
FDT
- 1D
- 3.59%
- 1M
- -10.30%
- YTD
- 9.83%
- 6M
- 17.39%
- 1Y
- 54.93%
- 3Y*
- 24.48%
- 5Y*
- 11.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.73%
FIDZX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -13.00%
- YTD
- -8.14%
- 6M
- -8.42%
- 1Y
- 6.62%
- 3Y*
- 9.86%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDT vs. FIDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than FIDZX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDT vs. FIDZX — Risk / Return Rank
FDT
FIDZX
FDT vs. FIDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (FIDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDT | FIDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.86 | 0.29 | +2.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.48 | 0.55 | +2.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.08 | +0.47 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.01 | 0.30 | +3.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.70 | 1.18 | +15.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDT | FIDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 0.29 | +2.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.25 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.52 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDT and FIDZX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDT vs. FIDZX - Dividend Comparison
FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than FIDZX's 6.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 3.24% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
FIDZX Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z | 6.06% | 5.57% | 0.84% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 3.90% | 0.19% | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FDT vs. FIDZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDT drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, which is greater than FIDZX's maximum drawdown of -37.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDT and FIDZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDT | FIDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.10% | -37.17% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -14.44% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.18% | -37.17% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.30% | -14.44% | +4.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.86% | -7.62% | -3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 3.60% | -0.38% |
Volatility
FDT vs. FIDZX - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a higher volatility of 9.73% compared to Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (FIDZX) at 7.73%. This indicates that FDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIDZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDT | FIDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.73% | 7.73% | +2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.97% | 12.35% | +1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.35% | 19.48% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 18.45% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 18.19% | +0.13% |