PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCO vs. XOMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCO vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCO achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 16.83% return.


FLCO

1D
0.19%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.59%
6M
0.59%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*

XOMO

1D
-0.36%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
16.83%
6M
19.65%
1Y
31.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCO vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FLCO
Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF
0.59%7.53%1.93%5.31%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
16.83%6.90%6.11%-8.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCO and XOMO is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2023

-0.07

The correlation between FLCO and XOMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCO vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCO
FLCO Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FLCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCO vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCOXOMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.28

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.31

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.66

6.43

-0.77

FLCO vs. XOMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCO Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the XOMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCO and XOMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCOXOMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.58

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.38

-0.06

Drawdowns

FLCO vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCO drawdown since its inception was -22.71%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCO and XOMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCOXOMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.71%

-18.90%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-13.73%

+10.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-10.21%

+8.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-7.22%

+1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

4.92%

-4.00%

Volatility

FLCO vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) is 1.42%, while YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that FLCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCOXOMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

7.49%

-6.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.25%

16.60%

-13.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.43%

20.05%

-15.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.14%

18.93%

-11.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.83%

18.93%

-12.10%

FLCO vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCO vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison

FLCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, less than XOMO's 35.68% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLCO
Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF
4.65%4.60%4.63%3.83%3.85%2.85%3.99%3.39%3.86%3.33%0.51%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
35.68%31.64%26.94%5.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCO and XOMO have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOMO has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to FLCO (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCO dropped -22.71% vs XOMO's -18.90%.

On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 31.56% vs 5.18% for FLCO. On fees, FLCO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FLCO has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 31.56% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLCO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.

XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 35.68%, compared with 4.65% for FLCO.

FLCO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XOMO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLCO and 1.01% for XOMO.

XOMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCO and XOMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer