PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCO vs. JPIB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCO vs. JPIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) and JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCO achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than JPIB's 0.74% return.


FLCO

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.57%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.31%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
4.97%
5Y*
0.17%
10Y*

JPIB

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.81%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.71%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
5.79%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCO vs. JPIB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCO
Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF
0.40%7.53%1.93%7.94%-16.08%-2.06%10.01%14.82%-3.06%2.62%
JPIB
JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF
0.74%8.19%3.48%8.68%-6.38%0.14%7.14%10.76%-2.17%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCO and JPIB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2017

0.47

Over the past year, FLCO and JPIB have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.

FLCO vs. JPIB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLCO
JPIB

Financial Services

12.6%
13.4%

Healthcare

2.8%
0.7%

Communication Services

2.4%
4.0%

Industrials

2.1%
0.1%

Energy

1.7%
1.0%

Technology

1.1%
0.6%

Basic Materials

0.5%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
1.0%

Real Estate

-

0.2%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Financial Services

FLCO
12.6%
JPIB
13.4%

Healthcare

FLCO
2.8%
JPIB
0.7%

Communication Services

FLCO
2.4%
JPIB
4.0%

Industrials

FLCO
2.1%
JPIB
0.1%

Energy

FLCO
1.7%
JPIB
1.0%

Technology

FLCO
1.1%
JPIB
0.6%

Basic Materials

FLCO
0.5%
JPIB
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

FLCO
0.3%
JPIB
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FLCO
0.0%
JPIB
1.0%

Real Estate

FLCO

-

JPIB
0.2%

Utilities

FLCO

-

JPIB
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCO vs. JPIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCO
FLCO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FLCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

JPIB
JPIB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JPIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPIB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
JPIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPIB Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCO vs. JPIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) and JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCOJPIBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

1.46

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

2.07

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.37

+0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.16

4.78

+1.38

FLCO vs. JPIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCO Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the JPIB Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCO and JPIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCOJPIBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.46

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.69

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.82

-0.50

Drawdowns

FLCO vs. JPIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCO drawdown since its inception was -22.71%, which is greater than JPIB's maximum drawdown of -13.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCO and JPIB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCOJPIBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.71%

-13.13%

-9.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-3.75%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.59%

-3.75%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.48%

-11.83%

-10.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.37%

-1.12%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-1.93%

-3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

1.07%

-0.15%

Volatility

FLCO vs. JPIB - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB) at 1.08%. This indicates that FLCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCOJPIBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

1.08%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.24%

3.00%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.42%

3.53%

+0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.15%

4.11%

+3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.83%

4.44%

+2.39%

FLCO vs. JPIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than JPIB's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCO vs. JPIB - Dividend Comparison

FLCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than JPIB's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLCO
Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF
4.66%4.60%4.63%3.83%3.85%2.85%3.99%3.39%3.86%3.33%0.51%
JPIB
JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF
5.02%4.85%4.57%4.35%3.10%2.59%3.14%4.66%5.83%1.81%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCO and JPIB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCO has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to JPIB (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCO dropped -22.71% vs JPIB's -13.13%.

On 5-year performance, JPIB leads with 2.83% vs 0.17% for FLCO. On fees, FLCO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JPIB has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JPIB has performed better with a 2.83% return vs 0.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLCO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for JPIB.

JPIB has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 4.66% for FLCO.

FLCO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while JPIB is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLCO and 0.50% for JPIB.

JPIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCO and JPIB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer