PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCO vs. AVIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCO vs. AVIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) and Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF (AVIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCO achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly higher than AVIG's 0.08% return.


FLCO

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.57%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.31%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
4.97%
5Y*
0.17%
10Y*

AVIG

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.08%
6M
0.01%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
4.44%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCO vs. AVIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLCO
Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF
0.40%7.53%1.93%7.94%-16.08%-2.06%2.41%
AVIG
Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF
0.08%7.98%1.55%6.41%-13.94%-2.15%0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCO and AVIG is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020

0.94

The correlation between FLCO and AVIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCO vs. AVIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCO
FLCO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FLCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

AVIG
AVIG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AVIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AVIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVIG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCO vs. AVIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) and Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF (AVIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCOAVIGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

1.40

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

2.06

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.92

+0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.16

5.85

+0.31

FLCO vs. AVIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCO Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the AVIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCO and AVIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCOAVIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.40

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.02

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

-0.02

+0.34

Drawdowns

FLCO vs. AVIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCO drawdown since its inception was -22.71%, which is greater than AVIG's maximum drawdown of -19.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCO and AVIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCOAVIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.71%

-19.64%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-2.82%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.59%

-6.03%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.48%

-19.47%

-3.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.37%

-1.66%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-7.75%

+1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.92%

0.00%

Volatility

FLCO vs. AVIG - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF (AVIG) at 1.32%. This indicates that FLCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCOAVIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

1.32%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.24%

2.85%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.42%

3.85%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.15%

6.23%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.83%

6.01%

+0.82%

FLCO vs. AVIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AVIG's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCO vs. AVIG - Dividend Comparison

FLCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than AVIG's 4.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AVIG
Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF
4.04%4.36%4.66%4.06%2.53%1.12%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLCO
Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF
4.66%4.60%4.63%3.83%3.85%2.85%3.99%3.39%3.86%3.33%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FLCO and AVIG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLCO has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to AVIG (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCO dropped -22.71% vs AVIG's -19.64%.

On 5-year performance, FLCO leads with 0.17% vs 0.13% for AVIG. On fees, AVIG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVIG has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLCO has performed better with a 0.17% return vs 0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVIG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLCO.

FLCO has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 4.04% for AVIG.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLCO and 0.15% for AVIG.

AVIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCO and AVIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer