FLCO vs. JCPB
FLCO (Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF) and JCPB (JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCO is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while JCPB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCO returned 0.17%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for JCPB. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLCO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for JCPB.
Performance
FLCO vs. JCPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCO achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than JCPB's 0.58% return.
FLCO
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 5.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
JCPB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCO vs. JCPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCO Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF | 0.40% | 7.53% | 1.93% | 7.94% | -16.08% | -2.06% | 10.01% | 12.36% |
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.58% | 7.98% | 2.96% | 7.13% | -12.90% | -0.51% | 9.19% | 7.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCO and JCPB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2019 | 0.81 |
The correlation between FLCO and JCPB shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FLCO vs. JCPB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLCO
JCPB
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FLCO
JCPB
Healthcare
FLCO
JCPB
Communication Services
FLCO
JCPB
Industrials
FLCO
JCPB
Energy
FLCO
JCPB
Technology
FLCO
JCPB
Basic Materials
FLCO
JCPB
Consumer Defensive
FLCO
JCPB
Consumer Cyclical
FLCO
JCPB
Real Estate
FLCO
-
JCPB
Utilities
FLCO
-
JCPB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCO vs. JCPB — Risk / Return Rank
FLCO
JCPB
FLCO vs. JCPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCO | JCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 1.63 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 2.42 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.29 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 2.26 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.16 | 6.88 | -0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCO | JCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.63 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.21 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.55 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
FLCO vs. JCPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCO drawdown since its inception was -22.71%, which is greater than JCPB's maximum drawdown of -16.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCO and JCPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCO | JCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.71% | -16.67% | -6.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | -2.71% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.59% | -5.97% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.48% | -16.67% | -5.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | -1.48% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -4.26% | -1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.89% | +0.03% |
Volatility
FLCO vs. JCPB - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) at 1.26%. This indicates that FLCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JCPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCO | JCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | 1.26% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.24% | 2.72% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.42% | 3.77% | +0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 5.38% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.83% | 5.05% | +1.78% |
FLCO vs. JCPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than JCPB's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLCO vs. JCPB - Dividend Comparison
FLCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than JCPB's 4.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCO Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF | 4.66% | 4.60% | 4.63% | 3.83% | 3.85% | 2.85% | 3.99% | 3.39% | 3.86% | 3.33% | 0.51% |
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.93% | 4.90% | 5.16% | 4.32% | 3.01% | 2.19% | 2.97% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, FLCO and JCPB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FLCO has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to JCPB (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCO dropped -22.71% vs JCPB's -16.67%.
On 5-year performance, JCPB leads with 1.11% vs 0.17% for FLCO. On fees, FLCO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JCPB has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JCPB has performed better with a 1.11% return vs 0.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLCO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for JCPB.
JCPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 4.66% for FLCO.
FLCO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while JCPB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLCO and 0.38% for JCPB.
JCPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLCO and JCPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer