FLCH vs. FLAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) and FLAX (Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while FLAX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCH returned -5.91%/yr vs 7.35%/yr for FLAX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.

Performance

FLCH vs. FLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -12.17% return, which is significantly lower than FLAX's 24.30% return.

FLCH

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: -5.67%
• YTD: -12.17%
• 6M: -12.94%
• 1Y: -0.05%
• 3Y*: 8.98%
• 5Y*: -5.91%
• 10Y*: —

FLAX

• 1D: -5.68%
• 1M: 2.36%
• YTD: 24.30%
• 6M: 25.58%
• 1Y: 48.51%
• 3Y*: 23.90%
• 5Y*: 7.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCH vs. FLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-12.17%	32.55%	18.00%	-11.21%	-22.74%	-20.87%	30.09%	24.32%	-21.66%
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF	24.30%	33.72%	9.82%	6.27%	-18.88%	-3.54%	24.17%	17.19%	-14.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCH and FLAX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018	0.83

The correlation between FLCH and FLAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLCH vs. FLAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLCH	FLAX
Consumer Cyclical	25.5%	9.1%
Technology	16.8%	46.4%
Industrials	15.5%	8.2%
Financial Services	14.4%	15.6%
Energy	12.6%	2.5%
Basic Materials	6.0%	3.6%
Communication Services	2.1%	5.6%
Healthcare	2.1%	2.9%
Utilities	2.0%	1.9%
Real Estate	1.6%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	2.4%

Return for Risk

FLCH vs. FLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 9
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 9

FLAX

FLAX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCH vs. FLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLCH	FLAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.00	2.21	-2.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.13	2.83	-2.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.43	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.00	3.75	-3.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.01	13.91	-13.92

FLCH vs. FLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCH Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the FLAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCH and FLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLCH vs. FLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, which is greater than FLAX's maximum drawdown of -42.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and FLAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCH	FLAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.09%	-42.51%	-19.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.59%	-12.99%	-6.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.43%	-19.29%	-6.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.78%	-38.64%	-17.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.09%	-5.68%	-32.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.55%	-15.34%	-15.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.32%	3.50%	+4.82%

Volatility

FLCH vs. FLAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) is 5.65%, while Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) has a volatility of 12.58%. This indicates that FLCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCH	FLAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.65%	12.58%	-6.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.07%	19.97%	-5.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.43%	22.02%	-2.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.63%	19.66%	+9.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.86%	20.26%	+7.60%

FLCH vs. FLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLCH and FLAX have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLCH vs. FLAX - Dividend Comparison

FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than FLAX's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF	1.46%	2.37%	3.12%	2.20%	2.86%	2.38%	1.57%	2.23%	2.35%	0.00%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	1.77%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCH and FLAX in my portfolio?

FLCH and FLAX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCH or FLAX?

FLAX has higher volatility (12.58%) compared to FLCH (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCH dropped -62.09% vs FLAX's -42.51%.

Which ETF is better, FLCH or FLAX?

On 5-year performance, FLAX leads with 7.35% vs -5.91% for FLCH. Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. On volatility, FLCH has been the lower-risk option at 5.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLCH or FLAX?

Over the 5-year period, FLAX has performed better with a 7.35% return vs -5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCH or FLAX?

FLCH and FLAX have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCH or FLAX?

FLCH has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.46% for FLAX.

What is the main difference between FLCH and FLAX?

FLCH is categorized as China Equities, while FLAX is Asia Pacific Equities. FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while FLAX tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.