FIVA vs. ONEQ
FIVA (Fidelity International Value Factor ETF) and ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FIVA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Fidelity® International Value Factor Index, while ONEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIVA returned 12.50%/yr vs 15.43%/yr for ONEQ. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIVA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for ONEQ.
Performance
FIVA vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ's 16.16% return.
FIVA
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 6M
- 18.20%
- 1Y
- 35.97%
- 3Y*
- 22.76%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- —
ONEQ
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 16.16%
- 6M
- 15.18%
- 1Y
- 39.62%
- 3Y*
- 27.68%
- 5Y*
- 15.43%
- 10Y*
- 19.68%
FIVA vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 12.92% | 45.83% | 2.53% | 20.38% | -10.37% | 15.90% | -1.78% | 19.78% | -19.20% |
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 16.16% | 20.89% | 29.30% | 45.73% | -32.12% | 22.11% | 44.87% | 38.01% | -8.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIVA and ONEQ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2018 | 0.61 |
The correlation between FIVA and ONEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
FIVA vs. ONEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FIVA
ONEQ
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
FIVA
ONEQ
Industrials
FIVA
ONEQ
Technology
FIVA
ONEQ
Healthcare
FIVA
ONEQ
Basic Materials
FIVA
ONEQ
Consumer Cyclical
FIVA
ONEQ
Energy
FIVA
ONEQ
Consumer Defensive
FIVA
ONEQ
Utilities
FIVA
ONEQ
Communication Services
FIVA
ONEQ
Real Estate
FIVA
ONEQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIVA vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank
FIVA
ONEQ
FIVA vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIVA | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | 2.48 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.31 | 3.26 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 3.15 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 12.46 | -0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIVA | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.48 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.70 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.65 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
FIVA vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and ONEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIVA | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.76% | -55.09% | +15.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | -12.64% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.77% | -24.09% | +9.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.70% | -35.23% | +6.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.85% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -7.95% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 3.19% | -0.20% |
Volatility
FIVA vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) at 4.20%. This indicates that FIVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIVA | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 4.20% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | 11.96% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 16.05% | -0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 22.14% | -5.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 21.71% | -3.81% |
FIVA vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIVA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIVA vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison
FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than ONEQ's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 2.52% | 2.68% | 3.52% | 3.63% | 3.62% | 3.76% | 2.46% | 3.61% | 3.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 0.67% | 0.54% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 2.51% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.12% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIVA and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIVA has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to ONEQ (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.
On 5-year performance, ONEQ leads with 15.43% vs 12.50% for FIVA. On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, ONEQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 15.43% return vs 12.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FIVA.
FIVA has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.67% for ONEQ.
FIVA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ONEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. FIVA tracks Fidelity® International Value Factor Index, while ONEQ tracks Nasdaq Composite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FIVA and 0.21% for ONEQ.
ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIVA and ONEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer