PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIVA vs. RWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIVA vs. RWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 16.41% return, which is significantly higher than RWX's 2.13% return.


FIVA

1D
-0.46%
1M
1.61%
6M
9.20%
YTD
16.41%
1Y
38.62%
3Y*
21.87%
5Y*
13.93%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.99%

RWX

1D
-1.39%
1M
2.71%
6M
-1.76%
YTD
2.13%
1Y
8.86%
3Y*
6.65%
5Y*
-1.79%
10Y*
0.78%
ALL TIME*
0.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.76M$2.92M$3.12M
$513.06K$1.21M$1.11M

FIVA vs. RWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
16.41%45.83%2.53%20.38%-10.37%15.90%-1.78%19.78%-18.62%
RWX
SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF
2.13%26.24%-12.15%6.25%-21.84%9.34%-9.03%19.88%-10.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVA and RWX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018

0.70

The correlation between FIVA and RWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIVA vs. RWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIVA
FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

RWX
RWX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
RWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
RWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIVA vs. RWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIVARWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.13

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

0.72

+2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.95

1.69

+11.26

FIVA vs. RWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the RWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVA and RWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIVA vs. RWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum RWX drawdown of -73.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and RWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIVARWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.76%

-73.62%

+33.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-13.58%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

-19.05%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.70%

-35.91%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-9.93%

+9.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.65%

-20.23%

+12.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

5.80%

-2.85%

Volatility

FIVA vs. RWX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) at 3.69%. This indicates that FIVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIVARWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

3.69%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

11.56%

+2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.00%

13.78%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

15.86%

+0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

16.25%

+1.66%

FIVA vs. RWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than RWX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIVA vs. RWX - Dividend Comparison

FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than RWX's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
2.59%2.68%3.52%3.63%3.62%3.76%2.46%3.61%3.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RWX
SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF
3.83%3.65%4.32%3.90%4.05%4.62%2.92%8.94%5.28%2.77%8.74%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIVA and RWX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIVA has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to RWX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs RWX's -73.62%.

On 5-year performance, FIVA leads with 13.93% vs -1.79% for RWX. On fees, FIVA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, RWX has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FIVA has performed better with a 13.93% return vs -1.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIVA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for RWX.

RWX has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 2.59% for FIVA.

FIVA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while RWX is REIT. FIVA tracks Fidelity International Value Factor Index, while RWX tracks Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. Real Estate Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FIVA and 0.59% for RWX.

FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIVA and RWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer