PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIVA vs. RWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIVA vs. RWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly higher than RWX's -2.35% return.


FIVA

1D
1.26%
1M
4.71%
YTD
13.33%
6M
18.97%
1Y
35.44%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*

RWX

1D
-0.33%
1M
-3.74%
YTD
-2.35%
6M
-0.94%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
5.38%
5Y*
-2.27%
10Y*
0.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVA vs. RWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
13.33%45.83%2.53%20.38%-10.37%15.90%-1.78%19.78%-19.20%
RWX
SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF
-2.35%26.24%-12.15%6.25%-21.84%9.34%-9.03%19.88%-10.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVA and RWX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2018

0.70

The correlation between FIVA and RWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIVA vs. RWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIVA
RWX

Financial Services

25.5%
2.8%

Industrials

19.3%
0.6%

Technology

11.4%
2.7%

Healthcare

8.6%
1.5%

Basic Materials

7.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
3.1%

Energy

6.1%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%

-

Utilities

3.9%

-

Communication Services

3.2%

-

Real Estate

1.8%
60.5%

Financial Services

FIVA
25.5%
RWX
2.8%

Industrials

FIVA
19.3%
RWX
0.6%

Technology

FIVA
11.4%
RWX
2.7%

Healthcare

FIVA
8.6%
RWX
1.5%

Basic Materials

FIVA
7.8%
RWX

-

Consumer Cyclical

FIVA
6.8%
RWX
3.1%

Energy

FIVA
6.1%
RWX
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

FIVA
5.6%
RWX

-

Utilities

FIVA
3.9%
RWX

-

Communication Services

FIVA
3.2%
RWX

-

Real Estate

FIVA
1.8%
RWX
60.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIVA vs. RWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVA
FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

RWX
RWX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
RWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
RWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVA vs. RWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIVARWXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.35

0.30

+2.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.26

0.52

+2.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.06

+0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

0.36

+2.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.39

1.09

+11.30

FIVA vs. RWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the RWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVA and RWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIVARWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

0.30

+2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

-0.14

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.03

+0.46

Drawdowns

FIVA vs. RWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum RWX drawdown of -73.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and RWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIVARWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.76%

-73.62%

+33.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-13.58%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

-19.05%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.70%

-35.91%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-13.89%

+13.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-20.30%

+12.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

4.48%

-1.49%

Volatility

FIVA vs. RWX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) at 4.13%. This indicates that FIVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIVARWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

4.13%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.39%

10.87%

+1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.20%

13.25%

+1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

15.84%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

16.49%

+1.42%

FIVA vs. RWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than RWX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIVA vs. RWX - Dividend Comparison

FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than RWX's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
2.51%2.68%3.52%3.63%3.62%3.76%2.46%3.61%3.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RWX
SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF
3.74%3.65%4.32%3.90%4.05%4.62%2.92%8.94%5.28%2.77%8.74%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIVA and RWX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIVA has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to RWX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs RWX's -73.62%.

On 5-year performance, FIVA leads with 12.79% vs -2.27% for RWX. On fees, FIVA is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RWX has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FIVA has performed better with a 12.79% return vs -2.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIVA is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for RWX.

RWX has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 2.51% for FIVA.

FIVA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while RWX is REIT. FIVA tracks Fidelity® International Value Factor Index, while RWX tracks Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. Real Estate Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FIVA and 0.59% for RWX.

FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIVA and RWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer